Abstract

Two novel paramagnetic octahedral chromium(IV) complexes with dianionic tridentate SNO donor ligands containing extended π-system have been synthesized while only a paramagnetic octahedral chromium(III) complex is obtained when a related dianionic tridentate ONO donor ligand is used under similar conditions. These bischelate complexes [Cr(abtsal) 2] ( 1) (abtsalH 2 is the Schiff base of o-aminobenzenethiol and salicylaldehyde), [Cr(4-PhTSCsal) 2] · H 2O ( 2) (4-PhTSCsalH 2 is the Schiff base of 4-phenylthiosemicarbazide and salicylaldehyde) and K[Cr(sap) 2] · H 2O ( 3) (sapH 2 is the tridentate Schiff base of salicylaldehyde and o-aminophenol) are characterized by elemental analyses, magnetic moment measurements, IR, UV–Vis and EPR spectroscopic studies. Compound 3 has been structurally characterized by X-ray crystallography. Measured room temperature (RT) magnetic moment values are 2.98 BM for 1 and 2.83 BM for 2 indicating a d 2 system with a triplet ground state in both the cases. On the other hand, the magnetic moment value for 3 is found to be 3.74 BM at RT and is consistent with the presence of three unpaired electrons for a d 3 Cr(III) ion. The magnetic moment values rule out the large spin–orbit coupling which is substantiated by the presence of RT EPR signals. Compounds 1 and 2 exhibit very similar powder EPR spectra at RT and LNT, which show the allowed transition Δ M s = ±1 ( g = 2.004 for both 1 and 2) as well as the “forbidden” half-field transition (Δ M s = ±2) at g = 4.105 for 1 and g = 4.318 for 2, respectively. The X-band LNT frozen glass EPR spectrum of 1 in DMF shows the presence of zero-field split rhombic symmetry character, and results in the parameters g ≅ 2.0, D = 740 G, and E = 260 G. It suggests that the intensity of Δ M s = ±2 forbidden transition is large due to the large D value. The X-band frozen glass EPR spectrum of compound 3 in DMF is found to be very similar to that reported for trans-[Cr(py) 4F 2] + in DMF–H 2O–MeOH glass. The large difference (∼700 mV) in the reduction potential for the two octahedral complexes 1 (−1.40 V) and 3 (−0.70 V) is attributed to the difference in their metal ion oxidation states.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call