Abstract

In the classic view of verbal short-term memory, immediate recall is achieved by maintaining phonological representations, while the influence of other linguistic information is negligible. According to language-based accounts, short-term retention of verbal material is inherently bound to language production and comprehension, thus also influenced by semantic or syntactic factors. In line with this, serial recall is better when lists are presented in a canonical word order for English rather than in a noncanonical order (e.g., when adjectives precede nouns rather than vice versa; Perham et al., 2009, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62[7], 1285–1293). However, in many languages, grammaticality is not exclusively determined by word order. In German, an adjective–noun sequence is grammatical only if the adjective is inflected in congruence with the noun’s person, number, and grammatical gender. Therefore, we investigated whether similar effects of syntactic word order occur in German. In two modified replications of Perham et al.’s study, we presented lists of three pairs of adjectives and nouns, presented in adjective–noun or in noun–adjective order. In addition, we manipulated morphosyntactic congruence between nouns and adjectives within pairs (Exp. 1: congruently inflected vs. uninflected adjectives; Exp. 2: congruently inflected vs. incongruently inflected adjectives). Both experiments show an interaction: Word order affected recall performance only when adjectives were inflected in congruence with the corresponding noun. These findings are in line with language-based models and indicate that, in a language that determines grammaticality in an interplay of syntactic and morphosyntactic factors, word order alone is not sufficient to improve verbal short-term memory.

Highlights

  • In the classic view of verbal short-term memory, immediate recall is achieved by maintaining phonological representations, while the influence of other linguistic information is negligible

  • Like Perham et al (2009), we found an advantage for lists presented in canonical order, but only when the adjective–noun sequences were congruent and grammatically correct

  • Our findings indicate that syntactic constraints on word order that can benefit serial recall of word lists are intertwined with other syntactic constraints such as adjective inflection

Read more

Summary

Method

Methods (number of participants, materials, and procedure) were chosen to resemble Perham et al.’s (2009) method as closely as possible. Participants Since we incorporated adjective inflection as an additional between factor, we doubled Perham et al.’s (2009) sample size and aimed to analyze 78 participants. To this end, we tested 84 native speakers of German who were compensated with course credit. In German, inflection of an adjective in congruence with a noun depends on the noun’s number and gender and on whether the noun phrase includes a definite article. The order of the two list types and the adjective inflection (uninflected vs inflected) varied depending on the experimental condition. After presentation of each list, participants had a 10-s retention interval followed by 15 s to recall the items in the presentation order on the response forms. A score of 0 could result from two different types of errors: When the response matched a different item in the list, the response was coded as an order error; when the response contained an item not in the respective list or the field was left empty, an item error was recorded

Results
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call