Abstract

Evidence that the motor and the linguistic systems share common syntactic representations would open new perspectives on language evolution. Here, crossing disciplinary boundaries, we explore potential parallels between the structure of simple actions and that of sentences. First, examining Typically Developing (TD) children displacing a bottle with or without knowledge of its weight prior to movement onset, we provide kinematic evidence that the sub-phases of this displacing action (reaching + moving the bottle) manifest a structure akin to linguistic embedded dependencies. Then, using the same motor task, we reveal that children suffering from specific language impairment (SLI), whose core deficit affects syntactic embedding and dependencies, manifest specific structural motor anomalies parallel to their linguistic deficits. In contrast to TD children, SLI children performed the displacing-action as if its sub-phases were juxtaposed rather than embedded. The specificity of SLI’s structural motor deficit was confirmed by testing an additional control group: Fragile-X Syndrome patients, whose language capacity, though delayed, comparatively spares embedded dependencies, displayed slower but structurally normal motor performances. By identifying the presence of structural representations and dependency computations in the motor system and by showing their selective deficit in SLI patients, these findings point to a potential motor origin for language syntax.

Highlights

  • The nature of the relationships between language and motor control is currently the object of growing attention [1]

  • To ascertain the specificity of specific language impairment (SLI) motor deficit we examined the performance of a group of Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) patients on the same motor task

  • By manipulating when participants access object weight information, we devised a way to build a motor distant dependency in order to probe the nature of the structural relation that the two sub-phases of a displacing action entertain

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The nature of the relationships between language and motor control is currently the object of growing attention [1]. Conjecture, prior weight knowledge could result in an asymmetric transfer of the weight effects to the topmost level of the hierarchical structure, i.e., to the ‘Reach sub-phase’ with a consequent reduction or absence of weight effects in the ‘Move sub-phase’ in analogy with the silent copy that a linguistic dependency leaves in the original complement position when a nominal phrase is displaced (e.g. the heavy/light bottle which I reach to move [the bottle]). In similarity with linguistic displacement, object weight effects could be so to speak ‘raised out’ of the Move sub-phase and be displaced to affect the Reach sub-phase, leaving in turn the kinematics parameters of the lower Move sub-component unaffected by weight, in analogy with the linguistic silent copy left after fronting in relative clauses [23] To test this hypothesis and probe the structural relation of the motor components of a simple structured action, we compared the behavior of Typically Developing (TD) children with that of children diagnosed with Specific Language Impairment (SLI). TD’s behavior enabled us to uncover the structural representation of the displacing-action, while the behavior of the language impaired population allowed us to trace potential parallels between motor and linguistic impairment

Results
Discussion
Ethics Statement
Participants
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call