SYNTACTIC REPEAT AS DOMINANT EXPRESSIVE MARKING (оn the basis of advocacy speeches)

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of syntactic repetition as dominants of expressive marking of advocacy speeches. Different approaches to the definition of repetition are considered and analyzed in the article; Various structural and semantic types of syntactic repetition as means of expressiveness of judicial speech were explored; revealed the most common types of repetition, having a suggestive charge in the lawyer's defensive speech. Over the past decades, in the linguistic theory, research into the systematic organization of text structures, role, place, and function-stylistic features of expressive linguistic means are becoming increasingly popular. In a special way, such a problem is projected into the analysis and study of court speeches as one of the most specific and actively supporting communicative genres. The linguistic repetition as an important feature of all levels of language belongs to a range of phenomena that are constantly at the center of the attention of researchers, and although its separate types are described in detail in the scientific literature, the generally accepted views on the essence and functional properties of the repetition in the judicial discourse that defines the overall orientation and relevance of the proposed article and expresses the attraction of the original factual material - the litigation speech by L. P. Fris in defense of V. F. Stepanov placed in the collection "Judicial speeches of lawyers of Ukraine".