Abstract

Objectives: To examine synovial tissue (ST) predictors of clinical differentiation in patients with seronegative undifferentiated peripheral inflammatory arthritis (UPIA).Methods: Fourty-two patients with IgA/IgM-Rheumatoid Factor and anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies negative UPIA, naive to Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs, underwent Gray Scale (GSUS) and power Doppler (PDUS) evaluation and Ultrasound (US) guided ST biopsy. CD68, CD3, CD21, CD20, and CD31 synovial expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Whole ST microRNA expression was assessed using miScript miRNA PCR Array. Peripheral blood (PB) and synovial fluid (SF) IL-6, VEGF-A, and VEGF-D levels were measured by ELISA and ST TNF expression was assessed by RT-PCR. Each patient was prospectively monitored and classified at baseline and within 1 year as UPIA, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Spondyloarthritis (SpA) or Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA), respectively.Results: At baseline, CD68+ cells were the most common cells within the lining layer (p < 0.001) in seronegative UPIA, directly correlating with GSUS (R = 0.36; p = 0.02) and PDUS (R = 0.55; p < 0.001). Synovial CD31+ vessels count directly correlated with GSUS (R = 0.41; p = 0.01) and PDUS (R = 0.52; p < 0.001). During the follow-up, 6 (14.3%) UPIA reached a definite diagnosis (2 RA, 2 SpA and 2 PsA, respectively). At baseline, UPIA who differentiated had higher GSUS (p = 0.01), PDUS scores (p = 0.02) and higher histological scores for CD68+ (p = 0.005 and p = 0.04 for lining and sublining respectively), sublining CD3+ cells (p = 0.002), CD31+ vessels count (p < 0.001) and higher IL-6 PB levels (p = 0.01) than patients who remained as UPIA. MiRNA PCR Array showed that among the 86 tested miRNA species, at baseline, miR-346 and miR-214 were significantly down-regulated (p = 0.02 for both) in ST of UPIA who differentiated than in patients who remained as UPIA, inversely correlating with the lining CD68+ cells IHC score (R = −0.641; p = 0.048) and CD31+ vessels count (R = −0.665; p = 0.036) and with higher baseline ST expression of TNF (p = 0.014). Finally, logistic regression analysis demonstrated that baseline GSUS and PDUS scores ≥1.5 [OR:22.93 (95%CI:0.98–534.30)] and CD31+ vessels count ≥24.3 [OR:23.66 (95%CI:1.50–373.02)] were independent factors associated with the development of definite arthritis.Conclusions: MiRNA signature, histological and US features of ST may help in the identification of seronegative UPIA with high likelihood of clinical differentiation toward definite seronegative arthritis.

Highlights

  • Undifferentiated Peripheral Inflammatory Arthritis (UPIA) is a common diagnosis in daily practice at the first clinical evaluation in rheumatological settings

  • Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that baseline GSUS and PDUS scores ≥1.5 [Odds Ratio (OR):22.93 (95%CI:0.98–534.30)] and CD31+ vessels count ≥24.3 [OR:23.66 (95%CI:1.50–373.02)] were independent factors associated with the development of definite arthritis

  • MiRNA signature, histological and US features of synovial tissue (ST) may help in the identification of seronegative UPIA with high likelihood of clinical differentiation toward definite seronegative arthritis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Undifferentiated Peripheral Inflammatory Arthritis (UPIA) is a common diagnosis in daily practice at the first clinical evaluation in rheumatological settings. Multinational recommendations on the management of UPIA patients have been produced [1], since the future diagnosis and prognosis represent important issues for clinical decision making, including the choice of treatment. Testing for Rheumatoid Factor (RF) and/or anticitrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) should be performed in the evaluation of UPIA patients, as these factors are predictive of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) diagnosis and prognosis, negative tests do not exclude progression to RA [2,3,4]. Due to the scarcity of evidences produced so far, its use is not recommended to increase the diagnostic and prognostic power of the clinical examination [6], as well as the use of synovial tissue (ST) biopsy as prognostic tool to foresee the future development of definite diagnosis in UPIA patients [7]. Very limited data are available on the diagnostic and prognostic value of synovial tissue biopsy in UPIA patients and regardless to ACPA and RF serological status, synovial CD68 positivity can differentiate among RA, Spondyloarthritis (SpA) and other diagnoses [8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call