Abstract

Traditional rice landraces are treasures for novel genes to develop climate-resilient cultivars. Seed viability and germination determine rice productivity under moisture stress. The present study evaluated 100 rice genotypes, including 85 traditional landraces and 15 improved cultivars from various agro-ecological zones of Tamil Nadu, along with moisture-stress-susceptible (IR 64) and moisture-stress-tolerant (IR 64 Drt1) checks. The landraces were screened over a range of osmotic potentials, namely (−) 1.0 MPa, (−) 1.25 MPa and (−) 1.5 MPa, for a period of 5 days in PEG-induced moisture stress. Physio-morphological traits, such as rate of germination, root and shoot length, vigor index, R/S ratio and relative water content (RWC), were assessed during early moisture stress at the maximum OP of (−) 1.5 MPa. The seed macromolecules, phytohormones (giberellic acid, auxin (IAA), cytokinin and abscisic acid), osmolytes and enzymatic antioxidants (catalase and superoxide dismutase) varied significantly between moisture stress and control treatments. The genotype Kuliyadichan registered more IAA and giberellic acid (44% and 35%, respectively, over moisture-stress-tolerant check (IR 64 Drt1), whereas all the landraces showed an elevated catalase activity, thus indicating that the tolerant landraces effectively eliminate oxidative damages. High-performance liquid chromatography analysis showed a reduction in cytokinin and an increase in ABA level under induced moisture stress. Hence, the inherent moisture-stress tolerance of six traditional landraces, such as Kuliyadichan, Rajalakshmi, Sahbhagi Dhan, Nootripathu, Chandaikar and Mallikar, was associated with metabolic responses, such as activation of hydrolytic enzymes, hormonal crosstalk, ROS signaling and antioxidant enzymes (especially catalase), when compared to the susceptible check, IR 64. Hence, these traditional rice landraces can serve as potential donors for introgression or pyramiding moisture-stress-tolerance traits toward developing climate-resilient rice cultivars.

Highlights

  • Global climatic-change impacts, such as prolonged moisture stress, water scarcity and changing precipitation pattern, are the major challenges to agriculture

  • The germination percent calculated for the survived rice genotypes revealed that Kuliyadichan and Rajalakshmi showed a maximum survival percentage of 88.94 and 78.89, respectively, when compared to the tolerant check, IR 64 Drt1, with a germination percent of 77.34, which is followed by the genotypes Sahbhagi Dhan (77.34%), Chandaikar (77.34%) Oheruchitteni (75.79%), Nootripathu (74.25%), Arikiraavi (71.15%), Chenkayama (71.15%), Arubathamkodai (69.61%) and Mallikar (64.96%)

  • The results showed that TSS, Giberellic Acid (GA) and hydrolytic enzymes possessed the highest positive value (>0.9), followed by proline, catalase activity (CAT) activity, Relative Water Content (RWC) and Indole Acetic Acid (IAA), in PC1

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Global climatic-change impacts, such as prolonged moisture stress, water scarcity and changing precipitation pattern, are the major challenges to agriculture. By 2050, the global demand for agricultural production is expected to increase by 70 percent due to the rising population [1]. Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is the key staple in the daily food basket of more than 70 percent of the Indian population. Rice is grown in a wide range of ecosystems, including flood-prone and moisture-stress-prone environments; even a small reduction in rice production may pose a considerable threat to food security [2]. In Asian countries, moisture stress is one of the predominant constraints adversely affecting rice productivity, as it prevails over varied lengths of time and intensity, irrespective of crop growth and development stages [3]. Severe moisture stress during the reproductive and grain-filling phase reduces the economic yield to 48–94% and 60%, respectively, in rice [4]. Climate changes bringing forth frequent and severe moisture-stress episodes emphasize the need to understand the root phenome in response to moisture stress [5,6]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call