Abstract

Climate and land-use change are predicted to lead to widespread changes in population dynamics, but quantitative predictions on the relative effects of these stressors have not yet been tested empirically. We analyzed historical abundance data of 110 terrestrial bird species sampled from 1983 to 2010 along 406 Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) across the northwestern USA. Using boosted-regression trees, we modeled bird abundance at the beginning of this interval as a function of (1) climate variables, (2) Landsat-derived landcover data, (3) the additive and interactive effects of climate and land-cover variables. We evaluated the capacity of each model set to predict observed 27-year bird population trends. On average, 45 species significantly declined over the period observed and only 8 increased (mean trend = -0.84%/year). Climate change alone significantly predicted observed abundance trends for 44/108 species (mean 0.37 ± 0.09 [SD]), land-cover changes alone predicted trends for 47/108 species (mean r = 0.36 ±0.09), and the synergistic effects predicted 59/108 species (mean r = 0.37 ±0.11). However, for 37 of these species, including information on land-cover change increased prediction success over climate data alone. Across stressors, species with trends that were predicted accurately were more likely to be in decline across the western USA. For instance, species with high correlations between predicted and observed abundances (> r = 0.6) were declining at rates that were on average >2%/ year. This indicates that abundance models have the capacity to predict the species most likely to be at risk from climate and land-use change, but for many species there were substantial discrepancies between modeled and observed trends. Nevertheless, our results highlight that climate change is already influencing bird populations of the western U.S. and that such effects often operate synergistically with land-cover change to affect population declines.

Highlights

  • Destruction of habitats through direct human exploitation is the greatest contemporary cause of terrestrial biodiversity declines (Newbold et al, 2015)

  • Accurate models for predicting future changes in species distributions and population trends are essential for understanding the effects of global change and in policy development (Mazziotta et al, 2015; Thomas, 2017; Titeux et al, 2017)

  • Considerable efforts have been made in recent years to assess the effects of the diverse aspects of global change on the ecosystems (Pearson and Dawson, 2003)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Destruction of habitats through direct human exploitation is the greatest contemporary cause of terrestrial biodiversity declines (Newbold et al, 2015). The influence of recent climate change is exerting a clear influence on species’ populations and biodiversity (Parmesan, 2006; Both et al, 2009; Gutiérrez Illán et al, 2014) and these effects are expected to intensify over the coming decades (Thomas et al, 2004). The effects of these two anthropogenic stressors have been considered in isolation, but there are strong theoretical reasons to expect that they can interact synergistically to drive biodiversity declines (Travis, 2003; Opdam and Wascher, 2004). Populations that are already in decline due to habitat loss may be less likely to behaviorally adapt to climate change; lower recruitment reduces the number of natal dispersers, and the potential for prospecting and colonization of newly available habitat at the range edge (Holt and Keitt, 2000). Loss or degradation of certain habitat types (e.g., forest) can cause regional rainfall reductions, thereby intensifying negative climate effects (Lawrence and Vandecar, 2015)

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.