Abstract

ObjectiveRealgar–Indigo Naturalis formula (RIF) is a well-known arsenic-containing preparation that is used to treat acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) in China. In recent multicenter clinical trials, complete remission rates in APL patients have ranged from 96.08% to 100%. RIF has a satisfactory therapeutic effect, but its safety is a widespread concern, since the preparation contains arsenic, a wide-ranging and naturally occurring toxicant. In this study, in order to determine the toxic potential of RIF, acute toxicity and sub chronic toxicity assays were performed to evaluate the toxic potential of Realgar and the adjuvant components of RIF in addition to Realgar's synergy with these adjuvant components. MethodsKM mice and Wistar rats were selected for these experiments. To evaluate acute toxicity, the toxic effects of a single dose of a gradient of concentrations of Realgar were firstly determined. Then, the toxic effects of combinations of gradient doses of Realgar and fixed doses of Indigo naturalis and Salvia miltiorrhiza were evaluated. ResultsThe results showed that when Realgar was used alone, the LD50 was 2756.73 mg/kg (equivalent to 23.6 mg/kg As2O3). However, the LD50 dropped to 936.90 mg/kg when Realgarwas used with I. naturalis. By contrast, the LD50 increased to 7538.86 mg/kg when Realgar was used with S. miltiorrhiza. Hence, I. naturalis strengthened the toxicity of Realgar, whereas S. miltiorrhiza displayed the opposite effect. The sub chronic toxicity assessment results revealed a trend that was consistent with acute toxicity. Changes in the levels of different valence states of arsenic were also taken into account. The test results of the effects of in vitro combinations of Realgar and adjuvant components on soluble arsenic dissolution showed that I. naturalis increased the level of soluble arsenic in Realgar extracts and I. naturalis suspensions when theRealgar/I. naturalis ratio was 2, 1.5, and 1.0. However, S. miltiorrhiza did not affect it. ConclusionBased on the collective experimental results presented here, it can be concluded that the toxicity of RIF is the result of the soluble arsenic in Realgar and that the I. naturalis and S. miltiorrhiza in the RIF exert completely opposite effects on the toxicity of Realgar. This maybe an intelligent explanation for the compatibility of this formula, and this RIF study may therefore be viewed as a classic case of traditional Chinese medicine research on compatibility.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call