Abstract

Aiming and tapping movements were analysed repeatedly over a three-week period in a patient who was hemideafferented due to an ischaemic posterior thalamic lesion. Contrasting behaviour observed in six healthy subjects, nine hemiparetic patients and one patient with hemianopic stroke, allowed the determination of behavioural deficits related to deafferentation. Finger tapping was not impaired specifically and did not improve with practice in the deafferented patient. When aiming movements were investigated, accuracy of the first, largely preprogrammed, phase of movement and timing of the late homing-in phase were impaired specifically in the deafferented patient. Practice led to a step-like change in preprogramming amplitude of the ballistic movement component, a gradual improvement of temporal efficiency of the early movement phase and a more marked improvement of the homing-in phase. Qualitatively comparable but quantitatively less marked effects of practice were documented for hemiparetic patients. These results demonstrated that deafferentation affects preprogrammed aspects of movement and those influenced by current control and that motor learning is possible with central deafferentation, even for aspects of performance that are impaired specifically. It is postulated that motor learning was mediated by changes in strategy (motor programming) and improved efficiency of intact motor control processes (visuomotor control).

Highlights

  • Mott and Sherrington (1895) found that surgical deafferentation of a limb of a monkey led to an unwillingness to use the limb in purposeful action

  • Further investigations were undertaken to determine whether motor learning occurred with training in the deafferented patient, which aspects of motor behaviour showed improvement and how the effects of training compared with those demonstrated in hemiparetic patients receiving the same training schedule

  • Durations of the first and second phase of the aiming movement were prolonged in patient G, the hemiparetic patients and the hemianopic patient

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mott and Sherrington (1895) found that surgical deafferentation of a limb of a monkey led to an unwillingness to use the limb in purposeful action. It was shown repeatedly that deafferentation in monkeys does not abolish the capacity to make purposeful movements but leads to poor coordination and inaccuracy of movements (Munk, 1909; Knapp et ai., 1963). Positive effects ofpractice on motor behaviour were reported in animal studies (Munk, 1909; Taub, 1977) but these effects have not been investigated in detail in man. Comparing the level of performance in this patient with that observed in hemiparetic and hemianopic patients and in healthy subjects revealed behavioural deficits related,. Further investigations were undertaken to determine whether motor learning occurred with training in the deafferented patient, which aspects of motor behaviour showed improvement and how the effects of training compared with those demonstrated in hemiparetic patients receiving the same training schedule

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.