Abstract

The study of the alteration process, and in particular of secondary phases precipitated in pottery after its production, can constrain the post-depositional environments or the type of use of the pottery. Detailed study of secondary phases can be done using different approaches, based on microscopic, microstructural and microchemical analyses, as well as mineralogical methods. In the present study are reported the results of the application of punctual mineralogical analysis by synchrotron through-the-substrate microdiffraction (tts-μXRD) to analyse secondary phases precipitated in ancient pottery (Bronze Age pottery form Frattesina in Italy and Mesolithic pottery form Al Khiday in Sudan). Although the chemical composition of these secondary phases in many cases almost matches with the stoichiometric composition of a known mineral, only some of them were actually true mineral phases (i.e. with crystallinity and therefore showing diffraction peaks), while others were amorphous. Some phases, the occurrence of which was previously attested only on the basis of their chemical composition (determined by scanning electron microscope or the electron microprobe analysis), were univocally identified as true vivianite (Fe3(PO4)2·8H2O) and crandallite (CaAl3(PO4)2(OH)5·H2O) minerals. Part of the phases detected in studied pottery, the chemical composition of which was consistent with specific mineral phases, were instead amorphous. The synchrotron through-the-substrate microdiffraction (tts-μXRD), therefore, represents a valid method for properly determine the mineralogical nature of secondary phases in pottery, as well as other small-sized and rare mineral phases occurring in polycrystalline materials of archaeological interest, such as pottery, mortars, painting and glassy materials.

Highlights

  • Secondary phases in archaeological ceramics represent the products of post-depositional processes or contamination related to the pottery use

  • The mineralogical analysis of the secondary phases observed in the studied samples shows that only some of them are crystalline, while others are amorphous

  • When the diffraction peaks of this phase are compared to those observed at the tts-μXRD, it can be seen that some peak are missing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Secondary phases in archaeological ceramics represent the products of post-depositional processes or contamination related to the pottery use. In most of the cases, secondary phases precipitate in voids of the pottery paste and are located in specific and often sub-millimetric or even micrometric sites. They can crystallize and constitute a true mineral or precipitate in form of an amorphous phase. Local analytical techniques, such as microanalysis at the scanning electron microscope or at the electron microprobe, can be used to retrieve successfully their chemical composition Determination of their crystalline nature is more difficult, since the structural methods commonly used (X-ray powder diffraction: XRPD) require large amount of material compared with that available for the secondary phases that sometimes appear in pottery.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.