Abstract

AbstractCoupled dissolution‐precipitation reactions, where two minerals share a common ion, occur frequently in geological replacement; the reactions are driven by an inflow of precipitating secondary ions and an outflow of dissolved primary ions. Although crystallization pressure is frequently invoked to explain volume‐preserving replacement, it cannot be operative if the chemical reactions lead to a loss of mineral volume; here the host rock that should confine the precipitating mineral is dissolving faster than the grains are growing. In this paper we propose two chemical mechanisms by which a rapid dissolution front and a slower precipitation front can be synchronized, and volume‐for‐volume replacement preserved. We analyze these mechanisms within the framework of reactive transport theory and show that morphological features observed in calcite replacement can be correlated with predictions of the models.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call