Abstract

β-catenin, the principal effector of the Wnt pathway, is also one of the cadherin cell adhesion molecules; therefore, it fulfills signaling and structural roles in most of the tissues and organs. It has been reported that β-catenin in the liver regulates metabolic responses such as gluconeogenesis and histological changes in response to obesity-promoting diets. The function and cellular location of β-catenin is finely modulated by coordinated sequences of phosphorylation–dephosphorylation events. In this article, we evaluated the levels and cellular localization of liver β-catenin variants, more specifically β-catenin phosphorylated in serine 33 (this phosphorylation provides recognizing sites for β-TrCP, which results in ubiquitination and posterior proteasomal degradation of β-catenin) and β-catenin phosphorylated in serine 675 (phosphorylation that enhances signaling and transcriptional activity of β-catenin through recruitment of different transcriptional coactivators). β-catenin phosphorylated in serine 33 in the nucleus shows day–night fluctuations in their expression level in the Ad Libitum group. In addition, we used a daytime restricted feeding (DRF) protocol to show that the above effects are sensitive to food access-dependent circadian synchronization. We found through western blot and immunohistochemical analyses that DRF protocol promoted (1) higher total β-catenins levels mainly associated with the plasma membrane, (2) reduced the presence of cytoplasmic β-catenin phosphorylated in serine 33, (3) an increase in nuclear β-catenin phosphorylated in serine 675, (4) differential co-localization of total β-catenins/β-catenin phosphorylated in serine 33 and total β-catenins/β-catenin phosphorylated in serine 675 at different temporal points along day and in fasting and refeeding conditions, and (5) differential liver zonation of β-catenin variants studied along hepatic acinus. In conclusion, the present data comprehensively characterize the effect food synchronization has on the presence, subcellular distribution, and liver zonation of β-catenin variants. These results are relevant to understand the set of metabolic and structural liver adaptations that are associated with the expression of the food entrained oscillator (FEO).

Highlights

  • Daytime restricted feeding (DRF) is an accepted protocol to study the dynamic relationship between the circadian timing system and metabolic networks [1, 2]

  • Key experiments show that a variety of 24-h rhythmic responses under the DRF protocol, including the onset and maintenance of food-anticipatory activity (FAA), are elicited even when suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) functions are disrupted [references within Ref. [8]], which support the existence of an SCN-independent circadian timing system known as the food entrained oscillator (FEO) [9]

  • The fasting group (Fa) group exhibited a similar expression of pSer33 β-catenin to DRF at 11:00 hours in all fractions tested, whereas the refeeding group (Rf) group revealed a similar pattern in the total homogenate and in the nuclear fraction, but not in the cytosolic fraction; it showed a 61% reduction in pSer33 β-catenin compared to the DRF group (14:00 hours)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Daytime restricted feeding (DRF) is an accepted protocol to study the dynamic relationship between the circadian timing system and metabolic networks [1, 2]. DRF (2-h food access per day) involves two underlying aspects of daily physiological adjustments: [1] a circadian synchronization that shifts the phases of clock genes and [2] a hypocaloric food intake. Both aspects influence the adaptive response that allows an optimal metabolic handling of nutrients when food availability is restricted to a particular time of day [4, 5]. [8]], which support the existence of an SCN-independent circadian timing system known as the food entrained oscillator (FEO) [9]. Defining the FEO’s anatomical substrate has been elusive, in part because the existence of several FEOs in different organs and tissues [10] and the emergence of an alternative timing system that complements the SCN’s pacemaker activity [11, 12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.