Abstract

This chapter examines the importance of synchronising the policy frameworks guiding human settlement development in Zimbabwe. Mining settlements have emerged as enclaves administered by the mining owner and the Mining Commissioner (MC) outside the jurisdiction of urban or rural local authorities. Consequently, mining enclaves with lower planning standards have developed compromising principles of sustainable and smart settlements. However, upon their decommissioning, the settlements are handed over to local authorities that complain of assuming responsibility of settlements with lower planning standards. The chapter uses the Mazowe Gold Mine (MGM) in the Mashonaland Central Province as a case study. The research is informed by the social interpretivist paradigm, the qualitative research approach and the case study research design. Data collection was based on documentary review, key informant interviews and observations. The data were analysed through content review and thematic analysis. The study revealed that the fragmented policy framework for human settlement development in Zimbabwe has largely contributed to unsustainable mining enclaves that contravene national planning standards. Therefore, the study recommends the formulation of a holistic policy for promoting sustainable and smart settlements in Zimbabwe.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.