Symptomatic carotid webs and patent foramen ovale: RoPE score in competing stroke etiologies

Abstract

BackgroundPatent foramen ovale (PFO)-associated stroke is diagnosed more frequently in young patients with infrequent vascular risk factors and embolic appearing infarcts. The risk of paradoxical embolism (RoPE) score is used to identify PFO-associated stroke. Patients with symptomatic carotid artery web (CaW) share a very similar risk profile and these lesions are frequently overlooked. In this study, we evaluate the RoPE score profile in patients with suspected symptomatic CaW. MethodsRetrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients with symptomatic CaW as the presumed cause of stroke presenting to 2 comprehensive stroke centers from 2014 to 2021. CaW was diagnosed using computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the neck & head. Shunt study was done using a transthoracic, transesophageal, and/or transcranial-Doppler with bubbles. RoPE score ≥7 was considered high. ResultsSeventy-five patients had stroke from a symptomatic ipsilateral CaW. Mean age was 49.7±11.2 years and 74.7 % were females. Median RoPE score was 7 [5–8], and 52.0 % had a high RoPE score. PFO was detected in 13.3 % of the patients and 20.5 % within the high RoPE score group. Ten percent of the cases would have been misclassified as PFO-associated strokes based on RoPE score. ConclusionHigh RoPE scores were observed in the majority of patients with CaW-attributed stroke, and it should not be used to differentiate CaW- versus PFO-associated stroke. Careful extracranial internal carotid artery evaluation for CaW is warranted in cryptogenic strokes, including in PFO positive patients before defining stroke etiology.