Symptom management through electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO)-based intervention in patients with breast cancer treated with abemaciclib: Primary results from the LIBRA study, a phase II randomized controlled trial.

Abstract

11110 Background: We have developed a system using LINE, a widely-used social network service in Japan, for rapid collection of ePROs based on the PRO-CTCAE criteria. To evaluate the effectiveness of intervention through this system in reducing diarrhea frequency and enhancing quality of life (QOL) in patients treated with abemaciclib, we conducted a randomized controlled trial. Methods: Patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer scheduled to begin abemaciclib treatment were randomized to the intervention and control arms with 1:1 ratio. The LINE-ePRO system was used to monitor symptoms daily in both arms. In the intervention arm, expert medical staffs contacted patients via phone when symptoms met certain criteria, whereas patients in the control arm received standard care. The primary endpoint was the increase in the number of defecations from baseline during 28 days. The secondary endpoints included the increase in the number of defecations from baseline during 56 days, other symptoms monitored via the LINE-ePRO system, QOL evaluated by EORTC QLQ C-30 and EQ-5D-5L, relative dose intensity (RDI), treatment interruption rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). This study (LIBRA, UMIN000045432) is funded by Eli Lilly. Results: Between Jan 2022 and Apr 2023, 60 women were enrolled and 58 (29 in each arm) were analyzed in this study. Median age was 57.5 years (range 43-80), 93% of patients were post-menopausal, 71% received abemaciclib as first-line treatment, and 74% were treated in combination with aromatase inhibitors. The increase in the number of defecations from baseline was significantly lower in the intervention arm compared to the control arm both during 28 days (0.64 vs. 1.21 per day, p=0.003) and during 56 days (0.55 vs. 1.18 per day, p=0.0004). No significant difference was observed in other symptoms between the arms. In the EORTC QLQ C-30 scales, global health status/QOL (mean score change from baseline to after one cycle of abemaciclib treatment: 0 vs. -13.5, p=0.038) and diarrhea (20.7 vs. 32.2, p=0.049) were better in the intervention arm. The treatment interruption and dose reduction rates were 41.4 and 31.0% in the intervention arm, and 31.0 and 27.6% in the control arm, respectively. The mean RDI of abemaciclib was numerically lower in the intervention arm (73.5% vs. 84.8%). Conclusions: This study is the first randomized trial to demonstrate that the intervention based on daily ePROs reduces the frequency of diarrhea in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with abemaciclib. Clinical trial information: UMIN000045432.