Abstract

Temporal isolation remains an understudied, and potentially under-appreciated, mechanism of reproductive isolation. Phenological differences have been discovered in populations of the pine white butterfly (Neophasia menapia), a typically univoltine species found throughout western North America. At two locations in the Coast Range of California there are two periods of adult emergence per year, one in early summer (July) and one in late summer/autumn (September/October). Differences in flight time are accompanied by differences in wing shape and pigmentation. Here we use a combination of population genomics and morphological analyses to assess the extent to which temporal isolation is able to limit gene flow between sympatric early and late flights. Not only did we detect both genetic and morphological differences between early and late flights at the two sites, we also found that the patterns of differentiation between the two flights were different at each location, suggesting an independent origin for the two sympatric flights. Additionally, we found no evidence that these sympatric flights originated via colonization from any of the other sampled localities. We discuss several potential hypotheses about the origin of these temporally isolated sympatric flights.

Highlights

  • The study of the origin and maintenance of reproductive isolation remains a central focus in evolutionary biology and provides key insights into the process of speciation

  • Our data were used to test the hypothesis of temporal isolation between sympatric early and late flights and examine various

  • We found strong genetic differentiation between the two nominal species, N. terlootii and N. menapia

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The study of the origin and maintenance of reproductive isolation remains a central focus in evolutionary biology and provides key insights into the process of speciation. The seasonal timing of life history events, can act as a reproductively isolating mechanism. Our knowledge of the evolutionary consequences of this isolation, its role in diversification, is relatively incomplete [1,2,3,4]. Phenological differences may arise in response to other diversifying mechanisms. Environmental change, geographic isolation, or a shift in resource use may drive the evolution of phenology [5, 6]. In many cases temporal isolation is considered to reinforce reproductive isolation, rather than to be the primary

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call