Abstract

We propose that observables in quantum theory are properly understood as representatives of symmetry-invariant quantities relating one system to another, the latter to be called a reference system. We provide a rigorous mathematical language to introduce and study quantum reference systems, showing that the orthodox “absolute” quantities are good representatives of observable relative quantities if the reference state is suitably localised. We use this relational formalism to critique the literature on the relationship between reference frames and superselection rules, settling a long-standing debate on the subject.

Highlights

  • In classical physics, symmetry, reference frames and the relativity of physical quantities are intimately connected

  • In the quantum case, there arises an ambiguity regarding the definition of a reference frame: if it is classical, this raises the spectre of the lack of universality of quantum mechanics along with technical difficulties surrounding hybrid classicalquantum systems; if quantum, such a frame is subject to difficulties of definition and interpretation arising from indeterminacy, incompatibility, entanglement, and other quantum properties

  • The apparatus is not required to function as a reference system, which is internal to the measurement device and whose localisation controls the quality of the approximation by the absolute quantity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Symmetry, reference frames and the relativity of physical quantities are intimately connected.

Observables and States
Covariant POMs and Localisability
Covariant Phases
Observables as Invariant Quantities
Number and Phase
Position and Momentum
Relativisation
Definition and Properties of the Map
The normality of follows from being the dual of the positive linear map
Examples
Basic Properties
Further Properties
Restrictions After
High Localisation
Phase Delocalisation
Discussion
Absolute Coherence
Summary and Analysis of a Potential Objection
Fully Relational Picture
States
Coherence Revisited
Measurement
Measurement Theory
Conservation Laws
Strong Conservation
Weak Conservation
10 Interference Phenomena
10.1 Interferometry
10.2 Model 1
10.3 Model 2
10.4 Model 3
Brief Discussion
10.6 High Phase Localisation
10.7 Interpretation
10.7.1 Meaning of the Limit
11 Controversies
11.1 Brief Overview
11.2 The Exchange Between Aharonov-Susskind and Wick-Wightman-Wigner
11.2.2 Reply of Aharonov and Susskind
11.3.1 Analysis of the Opposing Standpoints
11.4 Further Analysis
11.4.1 A Cautionary Note
11.5 Reality of Optical Coherence
12 Summary and Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call