Abstract

Evaluation of statistical factors in self-assembly processes is not a firmly settled question. As a contribution to solve this problem, a critical re-examination of the symmetry number method and generalization of the direct count method are presented. The two approaches, producing the same results, mutually reinforce their role with respect to other discordant methods whose results cannot be independently checked. The direct count method moreover serves as a rationale for the apparently odd results the symmetry number method sometimes provides. The two methods thus turn out to be complementary to each other. Discussion of some exemplary cases points to the importance and subtlety of the role played by the geometrical features of assemblies involving intramolecular bonds.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.