Abstract
In the general case of a Karle-Hauptman matrix containing no symmetry equivalent reflections, maximizing the determinant as a function of the phases does not necessarily lead to an unambiguous solution of the phase problem. Individual phases may be shifted from their correct values in a seemingly completely arbitrary way. This problem is discussed in simple mathematical terms and a method is proposed allowing the identification of those elements in a Karle-Hauptman matrix possibly suffering from the effects discussed, given the space-group symmetry and the composition of the matrix. The conclusion reached in this paper is that only the presence of a sufficiently large number of symmetry equivalent reflections and/or Friedel opposites in a Karle-Hauptman matrix causes the Generalized Maximum Determinant Rule to be an effective tool in ab initio phase determination
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Zeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
