Abstract

Discretization of the integral equations that define widely-used ‘polarizable continuum’ solvation models fails to preserve certain properties of the integral operators. Consequently, the appropriate form of the finite-dimensional matrix equations is ambiguous, with two different asymmetric versions and also a symmetrized version as obvious possibilities. We demonstrate cases where solvation energies differ by as much as 24 kcal/mol amongst these variants. These differences are sometimes exacerbated by new discretization procedures that guarantee smooth potential energy surfaces. Formal and numerical arguments favor one particular formulation of the matrix equations.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.