Abstract
When Charles Dickens wrote Oliver Twist in the 1830s, poverty and crime were huge problems in London. To highlight these problems throughout his novel, the author used various literary techniques to create an interaction between the reader and the text in which text can have multiple meanings that can shift over the time. Thus, he uses symbols to evoke a range of additional meaning and significance. His purpose is to get the reader’s attention to construct meaning as the plot progress to what he intends to communicate about innocent individuals or villainous ones. Symbolism, irony, and satire were among the tools he used in his work. They work together to convey a deeper embedded meaning to cast suggestions about the development of the novel to emphasize the point the author seeks to stress throughout the novel. Drawing upon the importance of literary devices in unfolding the thematic concerns of the novel, this paper seeks to run an in-depth analysis of how symbolism played a vital role throughout Oliver Twist. The paper argues that through symbolism, the author channels meaning in Oliver Twist to develop the thematic concerns of the novel in creative ways to shape the reader’s response and to create a strong bond between the reader and the text. The paper argues that literary symbolism in Charles Dickens’s novel is based on evoking the mental image in the reader’s mind to structure meaning through his/her interaction with the text and then shaping his response according to his/her experience. It also creates a strong bond between the reader and the text.
Highlights
The interest in the readers response goes back in history to the time of Plato and Aristotle
2017: P18) The current paper argues that Charles Dickens’s literary devices are the building blocks that establish the strong bond between the reader and the text
Purpose of the study Through critical thinking, the aim of this research is to identify the role of literary symbolism in promoting the point of view of Charles Dickens’s novel Oliver Twist
Summary
The interest in the readers response goes back in history to the time of Plato and Aristotle. In The Republic, Plato considers the ways in which the reader receives texts in the famous parable of the cave in Book IX and in his Poetics, Aristotle is concerned with the effects produced on the reader by a tragic drama. Aristotle calls the feelings of pity and fear aroused in the reader or spectator of tragedy, catharsis. That’s to say a transcript basically acquires significant meaning when the audience interconnects with its words to regenerate the intended message according to his/ her response. Reading becomes meaningful once the audience interacts with the text he reads. This significant part occurs over a period of time of interaction mainly when the reader truthfully believes a piece of writing has a convincing existence. Will have his/her own experiences of a ‘text’. (Wolfreys, 2001: P 84-85)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
