Abstract

When deploying deep neural networks (DNNs), edge devices training is practical to improve model adaptivity for various user-specific scenarios while avoiding privacy disclosure. However, the training computation is intolerable for edge devices. It inspires sparse DNN training (SDT) into the limelight, which reduces training computation by dynamic weight pruning. Generally, SDT has two strategies based on the pruning granularity: the structured or the unstructured. Unfortunately, both of them suffer from limited training efficiency due to the gap between pruning granularity and hardware implementation. The former is hardware-friendly but has a low pruning ratio, indicating limited computation reduction. The latter has a high pruning ratio, but the unbalanced workload decreases utilization and irregular sparsity distribution causes considerable sparsity processing overhead. This paper proposes a software-hardware co- design to bridge the gap for improving the efficiency of SDT. On the algorithm side, a sub-structured pruning method, achieved with hybrid shape-wise and line-wise pruning, generates a high sparsity ratio and keeps the hardware-friendly property. On the hardware side, a sub-structured weight processing unit (SWPU) effectively handles the hybrid sparsity with three techniques. First, SWPU dynamically reorders the computation sequence with hamming-distance-based clustering, balancing the irregular workload. Second, SWPU performs runtime scheduling by exploiting the feature of sub-structured sparse convolution through a detect-before-load controller, which skips redundant memory access and sparsity processing. Third, SWPU performs sparse convolution by compressing operands with spatial disconnect log-based routing and recovers their location with bi-directional switching, avoiding the power-consumed routing logic. Synthesized with 28nm CMOS technology, SWPU can enable 0.56V-to-1.0V supply voltage with a maximum frequency of 675 MHz. It achieves a 50.1% higher pruning ratio than structured pruning and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$1.53\times $ </tex-math></inline-formula> higher energy efficiency than unstructured pruning. The peak energy efficiency of SWPU is 126.04TFLOPS/W, outperforming the state-of-the-art training processor by <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$1.67\times $ </tex-math></inline-formula> . When training a ResNet-18 model, SWPU reduces <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$3.72\times $ </tex-math></inline-formula> energy and offers <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$4.69\times $ </tex-math></inline-formula> speedup than previous sparse training processors.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call