Abstract

The effective detection of both prey and predators is pivotal for the survival of mesopredators. However, the condition of being a mesopredator is strongly context dependent. Here we focus on two aquatic caudate species that have colonised caves: the Pyrenean newt (Calotriton asper) and the olm (Proteus anguinus). The former maintains both surface and subterranean populations, while only cave-adapted populations of the latter exist. Both species are apex predators in underground waterbodies, while the Pyrenean newt is a mesopredator in surface waterbodies. Shifting to a higher level of the trophic web through colonising caves may promote the loss of anti-predator response against surface apex predators, and an increase in the ability to detect prey. To test these two non-exclusive hypotheses, we integrated classical behavioural characterisations with a novel approach: the assessment of lateralisation (i.e. preference for one body side exposure). Behavioural experiments were performed using laboratory-reared individuals. We performed 684 trials on 39 Pyrenean newts and eight olms. Under darkness and light conditions, we tested how exposure to different chemical cues (predatory fish, prey and unknown scent) affected individuals’ activity and lateralisation. Both cave and surface Pyrenean newts responded to predator cues, while olms did not. In Pyrenean newts, predator cues reduced the time spent in movement and time spent in lateralisation associated with hunting. Our results show that predator recognition is maintained in a species where recently separated populations inhabit environments lacking of higher predators, while such behaviour tends to be lost in populations with longer history of adaptation.Significance statementPredator recognition can be maintained in animals adapted to predator free habitats, but varies with their history of adaptation. Species that are not at the apex of the food web can become top predators if they colonise subterranean environments. We compared the behavioural responses of the olm, a strictly cave species with a long underground evolutionary history, and of the Pyrenean newt, a facultative cave species that also has stream-dwelling populations. Moreover, we integrated a classical behavioural characterisation, such as movement detection, with a novel approach: the assessment of lateralisation. While olms do not respond to external predators scent, cave-dwelling newts still recognise it. This clearly indicates that predator recognition is still maintained in species that have colonised predator-free environments more recently.

Highlights

  • Predator and prey recognition is a key behavioural aspect influencing the life history, evolution, and distribution of animals (Peckarsky et al 2008)

  • Even though being a meso- or an apex predator is generally related to body size, with larger predators preying upon smaller ones (Eklov and Svanback 2006; Donadio and Buskirk 2016), the position of a species within food webs is strongly context dependent and may differ between habitats and ontogenic stage (Ritchie and Johnson 2009; Braga et al 2019)

  • Pyrenean newts from surface populations moved on average (± SE) for 120.58 ± 2.17 s, while those from caves moved for 107.54 ± 2.97 s

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Predator and prey recognition is a key behavioural aspect influencing the life history, evolution, and distribution of animals (Peckarsky et al 2008). The predator recognition continuum hypothesis (Ferrari et al 2008) states that the ability of a prey to recognise predators strongly depends on both the spatial and temporal likelihood of being predated, and on the diversity of predators occurring locally. Animals occupying intermediate levels of food webs (mesopredators) hold the dual role of being both prey and predator (Haidir et al 2018; Roos et al 2018). Mesopredators experience both the constraints of being potential prey, and of being predators needing effective prey recognition. Dragonfly larvae are a classical example; at early life-stages, these organisms occupy an intermediate position in the food webs while, once they grow, they become the apex predators (Hopkins et al 2011; Start 2018)

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.