Abstract
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is the treatment of choice for cases with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Switching to an alternate anti-VEGF has been suggested as a possible option for resistant cases. The purpose of this review is to evaluate whether the timing of switching affects treatment outcomes. A review of published literature was performed looking at all studies where patients with refractory neovascular AMD were switched to an alternative anti-VEGF. Studies were then stratified based on the timing of switching into early (< 12 previous injections) and late (> 12 previous injections). A total of 38 studies were identified: 18 where patients were switched early and 20 where they were switched late. Both subgroups showed anatomic improvement after switching, with limited visual gains. There are insufficient data to recommend early versus late switching. However, both groups showed a reduction of fluid on optical coherence tomography and visual gains in 25% to 30% of patients. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018;49:166-170.].
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
