Abstract

To forecast biological responses to changing environments, we need to understand how a species's physiology varies through space and time and assess how changes in physiological function due to environmental changes may interact with phenotypic changes caused by other types of environmental variation. Amphibian larvae are well known for expressing environmentally induced phenotypes, but relatively little is known about how these responses might interact with changing temperatures and their thermal physiology. To address this question, we studied the thermal physiology of grey treefrog tadpoles (Hyla versicolor) by determining whether exposures to predator cues and an herbicide (Roundup) can alter their critical maximum temperature (CTmax) and their swimming speed across a range of temperatures, which provides estimates of optimal temperature (Topt) for swimming speed and the shape of the thermal performance curve (TPC). We discovered that predator cues induced a 0.4°C higher CTmax value, whereas the herbicide had no effect. Tadpoles exposed to predator cues or the herbicide swam faster than control tadpoles and the increase in burst speed was higher near Topt. In regard to the shape of the TPC, exposure to predator cues increased Topt by 1.5°C, while exposure to the herbicide marginally lowered Topt by 0.4°C. Combining predator cues and the herbicide produced an intermediate Topt that was 0.5°C higher than the control. To our knowledge this is the first study to demonstrate a predator altering the thermal physiology of amphibian larvae (prey) by increasing CTmax, increasing the optimum temperature, and producing changes in the thermal performance curves. Furthermore, these plastic responses of CTmax and TPC to different inducing environments should be considered when forecasting biological responses to global warming.

Highlights

  • Biological mechanisms underlying a response to environmental changes can be quite complex

  • We found an effect of predator cues but no effect of the herbicide or the interaction of both (Table 3)

  • Tadpoles exposed to predators had a critical maximum temperature (CTmax) that was 0.4uC higher than tadpoles not exposed to predators (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Biological mechanisms underlying a response to environmental changes can be quite complex. To forecast these biological responses, we need to understand how a species’ physiology varies through space and time [1,2] and assess how changes in physiological function induced by environmental changes (e.g., increasing environmental temperatures) may interact with phenotypic changes induced by other types of environmental variation [3,4,5,6]. Stressful environments can induce non-adaptive plasticity, increasing the variance around the mean phenotypic response or distancing it from the favored optimum. Pesticides can induce behavioral and morphological changes in organisms. Pesticides impede the induction of predator-induced morphology [18,19,20,21]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.