Abstract

Background and purposeCortical superficial siderosis (cSS) is a key neuroimaging marker of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) detected on blood-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We aimed to assess cSS in advanced CAA patients and explore differences in its evaluation between susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) and gradient recalled echo-T2* (GRE-T2*). Materials and methodsNeuroimaging data gathered from a prospective cohort of CAA patients with probable or definite CAA were retrospectively analyzed by two independent raters. SWI and GRE-T2* were used to assess presence and severity (absent, focal [≤3 sulci] or disseminated [>3 sulci]) of cSS and number of foci. Ratings were compared between sequences and inter-rater agreement was determined. Post hoc analysis explored differences in cSS multifocality scores. ResultsWe detected cSS in 38 patients with SWI and in 36 with GRE-T2* (70.4% versus 66.7%; P=0.5). The two raters agreed in detecting more disseminated cSS when using SWI: 16 focal (29.63%) and 20 disseminated (37.04%) cases of cSS seen on GRE-T2* and 11 (20.37%) focal and 27 (50%) disseminated cSS cases seen using SWI (P=0.008). Inter-rater agreement was equivalent for the two sequences (κpresence 0.7 versus 0.69; κseverity 0.74 versus 0.66) for assessing both presence and severity of cSS. Post hoc analysis showed higher multifocality scores from both raters’ SWI evaluations, with agreement equivalent to that for T2* evaluations. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that SWI ratings could show more disseminated cSS and higher multifocality scores in advanced CAA patients with inter-rater reliability equivalent to that obtained using GRE-T2*, regardless of level of experience.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.