Abstract

Since the turn of the millennium, Sweden has, like many other countries, become more neoliberal in many areas, including that of sport. The government has increased its expectations on the sports movement and become more result-oriented, which, for example, its revised motives for supporting the sports movement and the establishment of an audit organization can illustrate. However, in contrast to other countries, the Swedish government has not introduced any financial cutbacks in its support for sports. Rather, the opposite is true. The financial support has increased significantly over the last two decades. In the paper, we argue that this contradictory development of Swedish sport policy can be understood as expressions of neoliberalism and social entrepreneurship. As a theoretical concept, social entrepreneurship offers a way of understanding the increased Swedish government support for sport. There are in particular two underlying reasons for this claim. Firstly, sport is considered as a solution to various societal problems, such as social exclusion and refugee crises. Secondly, much of the increased support has been in form of various large-scale, earmarked, and time-limited political initiatives/reforms and project grants, which all have aimed to achieve social change through sport, such as social inclusion. In the paper, we consider these initiatives as expressions of social entrepreneurship. This paper contributes to the ongoing scholarly debate on how neoliberalism and neoliberal policies in the public sector have affected sport organizations. Also, by using social entrepreneurship theory, we provide new theoretical insights into how sport policy can be understood and analyzed.

Highlights

  • One of the major political changes that has taken place since the 1970s is the global advancement of neoliberalism and its far-reaching effects on many countries’ public welfare systems (Larsson, 2014)

  • We have shown that Swedish sport policy is a divergent case in an international context

  • Sweden has been affected by neoliberalism, thereby both reducing its public spending in relation to GDP and adopting new market-inspired governance doctrines (e.g., Peters, 2012; see Larsson et al, 2012)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

One of the major political changes that has taken place since the 1970s is the global advancement of neoliberalism and its far-reaching effects on many countries’ public welfare systems (Larsson, 2014). Despite recurring economic recessions and neoliberal welfare reforms, the public support for sport has increased significantly, among other things through the implementation of new grants. We synthesize and re-analyze the existing depiction of Swedish sport policy and present it in a new way Both primary and secondary data are included. The previous research and the documents are re-analyzed based on the concepts of neoliberalism, NPM, and social entrepreneurship Secondary data analysis, such as this, has become more prevalent (Smith, 2008), and a viable option for researchers to offer “interpretations, conclusions or knowledge additional to, or different from, those presented in the first report on the enquiry as a whole and its main results” Though, remember that many of the societal challenges are too complex to solve for an individual actor, such as a country, organization, or individual (Grieco, 2015)

A Policy for Social Entrepreneurship
A Transformed Swedish Sport Policy Model
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call