Abstract
Abstract. The eco-hydrological model SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) is a useful tool to simulate the effects of catchment processes and water management practices on the water cycle. For each catchment some model parameters (e.g. ground water delay time, ground water level) remain constant and therefore are used as constant values; other parameters such as soil types or land use are spatially variable and thus have to be spatially discretized. SWAT setup interfaces process input data to fit the data format requirements and to discretize the spatial characteristics of the catchment area. The primarily used configuration is the sub-watershed discretization scheme. This spatial setup method, however, results in a loss of spatial information which can be problematic for SWAT applications that require a spatially detailed description of the catchment area. At present no SWAT interface is available which provides the management of input and output data based on grid cells. To fill this gap, the authors developed a grid-based model interface. To perform hydrological studies, the SWAT user first calibrates the model to fit to the environmental and hydrological conditions of the catchment. Compared to the sub-watershed approach, the grid-based setup significantly increases model computation time and hence aggravates calibration according to established calibration guidelines. This paper describes how a conventional set of sub-watershed SWAT parameters can be used to calibrate the corresponding grid-based model. The procedure was evaluated in a sub-catchment of the River Elbe (Northern Germany). The simulation of daily discharge resulted in Nash-Sutcliffe efficiencies ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 and from 0.61 to 0.65 for the calibration and validation period respectively; thus model performance is satisfactory. The sub-watershed and grid configuration simulate comparable discharges at the catchment outlet (R2 = 0.99). Nevertheless, the major advantage of the grid-based set-up is an enhanced spatial description of landscape units inducing a more realistic spatial distribution of model output parameters.
Highlights
The eco-hydrological model SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool, Arnold et al, 1998) is a useful tool for a wide range of scales and environmental conditions
The most popular setup is the sub-watershed configuration, where the catchment is divided into sub-catchments and further sub-divided into hydrologic response units (HRUs)
Dobslaff (2005) and Schmalz and Fohrer (2009) reported similar values for the study area. The results of both model setups demonstrate that groundwater runoff dominates the water balance, a fact that is caused by the low gradients in the catchment
Summary
The eco-hydrological model SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool, Arnold et al, 1998) is a useful tool for a wide range of scales and environmental conditions. To set up a SWAT model run, the watershed has to be delineated and the spatial arrangement of catchment elements (e.g. sub-catchments, reach segments and point sources) has to be defined (Neitsch et al, 2011a). Individual areas of similar soil, topography and landuse are lumped together within a sub-catchment to form an HRU while in reality they are scattered throughout the subcatchment. This approach fails to show the interaction between the HRUs as they are spatially unlinked but routed to the outlet of the sub-catchment separately (Arnold et al, 2010)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.