Suularrn Birleemesine liikin Tannmlar, Sorunlar ve zzm nerileri (The Definitions, Problems and Solution Suggestions Related to Joinder of Offenses)

Abstract

Turkish Abstract: Suclarin birlesmesi (ictimai) konusundaki temel ilke cezalarin birlestirilmesidir; cezalarin birlesmesi kural, suclarin birlesmesi ise istisnadir1. Bu ilke 5237 sayili TCK’ya iliskin TBMM Adalet Komisyonu Raporu’nda “kac tane fi il varsa o kadar suc, kac tane suc varsa o kadar ceza vardir” seklinde ifade edilmistir2. Istisnayi olusturan suclarin birlesmesi temel olarak iki sekilde gerceklesmektedir: “fi kri ictima” ve “zincirleme suc”. Zincirleme suc TCK’nin 43. maddesinin 1. ve 3. fikralarinda, fi kri ictima ise 43. maddenin 2. ve 3. fikralari ile 44. maddede duzenlenmistir. Suclarin birlesmesi konusu icinde ele alinan ve bu baslik altinda islenen bir diger konu ise gorunuste ictimadir. Adi ustunde bu durumda birlesme gorunustedir, gercekte boyle bir birlesme bulunmamaktadir. Ancak yasal duzenlemede de ogretiye paralel sekilde bu durum suclarin birlesmesi bolumunde 42. maddede duzenlenmistir. Ancak 42. maddede “bu tur suclarda ictima hukumleri uygulanmaz” denilerek bunlarin suclarin birlesmesi hali olmadigi acik bir bicimde ifade edilmistir. English Abstract: In this article, a significant part of the theory of crime that has been causing some problems in practice called of is examined. issue is explained and discussed in the light of high court judgments and doctrinal arguments especially. basic principle at the of is the of punishments. rule is the of the punishments, whereas of is the exception. This principle was expressed in the Report of Grand National Assembly of Turkey Justice Commission relating 5237 numbered Turkish Penal Code(TPC) The number of the punisments are same as the number of crimes, the number of are same as the number of actions. exception of of occur in two ways: fictional and successive offence. Successive offence is at the Article 43/1, 3 of TPC, whereas fictional is at Article 43/2,3 and 44 of TPC. Another issue called apparently is examined within the scope of this title. In this situation the is apparent, not real as is evident from it's name. However this was arranged at the Article 42 under the part of of in legal regulation as parallel to the doctrine. Yet it expressed clearly by mentioning joinder regulations are not applied to such crimes that these are not the aspects of the of crimes.