Abstract
Social sustainability and sustainable urban developments are major challenges across the world both developed and developing countries. In general there is a conflict between the approach of sustainable development and social sustainability in the urban context. The concept of sustainability brings a key framework for extensive literature on urban design, architecture and planning. Nevertheless there is a considerable overlap between the social dimensions of sustainability and the theories or notions, for instance the ‘sustainable societies’ that are highlighted in the midst of other aspects: social equity and justice. Such society is widely expected to offer a situation for long-term social relations and activities which are sustainable, inclusive and equitable in a wider perception of the term (environmentally, socially and economically). The method adopted to address this aim involves a content analysis of available academic literature, with focus on the planning sustainable development, built environment, social sustainability, and urban planning fields. The findings demonstrate that in spite of some opposing evidence, many studies have confirmed that there has been displacement of the debate on the term of ‘sustainability’ from ‘ecological and environmental aspects into social and economic aspects’. It is related to how the community feel safe and comfortable living in their own communities, how have they felt of proud of the place where they live. The aim of the paper is to improve our understanding of current theories and practices of planning sustainable development and discuss whether the approach of sustainable development aligns with social sustainability objectives.
Highlights
The term ‘sustainability’ has emerged and evolved in several high-level meetings
The second part of this paper presents the findings of the study which expands on a perception of community in the urban context whether social sustainability is harmful or beneficial
The causative aspects of urban social sustainability have become an essential concern in some countries; it is frequently discussed in national-scale meetings
Summary
The term ‘sustainability’ has emerged and evolved in several high-level meetings. It has been agreed and widely accepted as a framework concept which is essential in the determination of policies set in the urban development. In line with Williams et al (2000), this concept delivers a key framework for substantial literature on urban design, architecture and planning It is reinforced by Bramley et al (2009), Davidson et al (2012), Ghahramanpouri et al (2013) and Nurul (2015) who propose that an essential apprehension amongst the linked elements of sustainability, which include economic, social, environmental elements, and the extensive understanding of the notion have led to a range of urban forms expressed as ‘sustainable’. There is a substantial overlap between the social dimensions of sustainability and the notions, for instance the ‘sustainable societies’ that are highlighted in the midst of other aspects: social equity and justice Such society is extensively foreseen to offer a situation for long-term social relations and activities which are sustainable, inclusive and equitable in a wider perception of the term (environmentally, socially and economically). The last section summarise the debates on the term of ‘sustainability’ which has shifted from discuss about ecological and environmental and into social and economic aspects
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
