Abstract

Smart city and smart hospital development comprise a mainstream strategy worldwide to enhance the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices. The smart healthcare industry needs to optimize its smart healthcare information strategies, creating the process-activity value and reducing the cost of healthcare without sacrificing the quality of patient care. This study proposes an decision model of Activity-Based Costing (ABC) concept and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques that integrates the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), Analytic Network Processes (ANP), the VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) and Zero-One Goal Programming (ZOGP) to achieve optimal smart healthcare information system portfolio strategy decisions. The resulting data shows that the perspective of government policy support and the criterion of Minimize Equipment Maintenance Costs are the most significant evaluation factors, and that the Health Data Informational System and Hospital Device and Drug Management System comprise by far the optimal portfolio of smart healthcare information system which strengthen the connection between ABC and MCDM techniques in evaluation process. The major contributions of this study are as follows: (1) the proposed model contributes to the management accounting innovation development of a sustainable city and Operation Research (OR) application; (2) the integrated model can promote the smart healthcare industry development and help decision makers to more accurately understand how to allocate resources and planning for intelligent-related activities to each smart healthcare information system through appropriate cost drivers.

Highlights

  • The World Health Organization (WHO) (2008) identified that “eHealth is the cost-effective and secure use of information communication technologies (ICT) in support of health-related fields, including healthcare services, health surveillance, health literature, and health education and research” [1]

  • According to the (D-R) values by the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method, this study found that the major influencing perspectives are Financial Management Benefit (FMB) and Government Policy Support (GPS) for smart healthcare information system (SHIS) selection

  • This study provided an integrated multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) and Activity-Based Costing budget plan for evaluating the smart healthcare information system of the smart hospital

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) (2008) identified that “eHealth is the cost-effective and secure use of information communication technologies (ICT) in support of health-related fields, including healthcare services, health surveillance, health literature, and health education and research” [1]. The multidimensional characteristics of smart healthcare information system selection are facing the challenge of complexity, solving the decision problem appropriately by combining the advantages of the multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, management accounting techniques (such as Activity-Based Costing) and the Mathematical Programming (GP) model. Existing studies have confirmed the feasibility of applying the MCDM model combining the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), the Analytic Network Process (ANP) and VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) in decision problem evaluation, such as reliability-based product optimization [4], sustainability performance evaluation [5], and food waste composting facilities [6] (Liu et al, 2018), and so on

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call