Abstract

Petrochemical refineries must separate hydrocarbon mixtures on a large scale for the production of fuels and chemicals. Typically, these hydrocarbons are separated by distillation, which is extremely energy intensive. This high energy cost can be mitigated by developing materials that can enable efficient adsorptive separation. In this critical review, the principles of adsorptive separation are outlined, and then the case for C4 separations by using zeolites and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) is examined. By analyzing both experimental and theoretical studies, the challenges and opportunities in C4 separation are outlined, with a focus on the separation mechanisms and structure–selectivity correlations. Zeolites are commonly used as adsorbents and, in some cases, can separate C4 mixtures well. The pore sizes of eight‐membered‐ring zeolites, for example, are in the order of the kinetic diameters of C4 isomers. Although zeolites have the advantage of a rigid and highly stable structure, this is often difficult to functionalize. MOFs are attractive candidates for hydrocarbon separation because their pores can be tailored to optimize the adsorbate–adsorbent interactions. MOF‐5 and ZIF‐7 show promising results in separating all C4 isomers, but breakthrough experiments under industrial conditions are needed to confirm these results. Moreover, the flexibility of the MOF structures could hamper their application under industrial conditions. Adsorptive separation is a promising viable alternative and it is likely to play an increasingly important role in tomorrow's refineries.

Highlights

  • Valorization of C4 hydrocarbons is an important research topic because of the market size and versatility of these bulk chemicals.[1]

  • Butane, propane, propene, and methanol were adsorbed in decreasing order, whereas the remaining compounds were not adsorbed. This shows that this metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) can separate normal C2, C3, and C4, from branched alkanes and normal hydrocarbons above C4.[64]. Molecular simulations showed that about 40 % more cis-2butene than trans-2-butene would fit into the cages

  • This is remarkable when compared with the findings of Hartmann et al.,[20] who found that the gas-phase separation of isobutane from isobutene was driven by van der Waals interactions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Valorization of C4 hydrocarbons (butane, 1-butene, 2-butene, isobutene, and 1,3-butadiene) is an important research topic because of the market size and versatility of these bulk chemicals.[1] Compared with ethene and propene, the main challenge in C4 compounds is their upgrading to high-value end products.[2] Large amounts of C4 hydrocarbons are coproduced with ethylene in steam cracking, as well as alongside gasoline in the fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) process.[3] there is increasing interest in valorizing the C4 hydrocarbons that arise from coal liquefaction and biomass refining. This can give advantages in terms of product recovery and purity, as well as energy costs.[7,14,15] we look at the state of the art of C4 separation by using microporous materials, with recommendations for possible industrial applications

Zeolites and MOFs
Adsorptive Separation
Separating C4 Hydrocarbons with Zeolites
Separating C4 Hydrocarbons with MOFs
Summary and Outlook
Findings
Conflict of interest
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call