Abstract

Sustainability is a complex and multifaceted concept that comprises environmental, economic, social, and cultural dimensions. Growing consumer concerns over the impacts of global meat production and consumption have led to increasing interest in sustainability initiatives and the use of sustainability labels. Yet, an understanding of what sustainability means to consumers in the context of meat and how consumers relate production-related credence attributes of chicken meat to sustainability remains limited. Between September 2019 and January 2020, an exploratory research study was conducted using a multi-method approach. Participants completed an online survey before participating in a series of eye-tracking choice tasks followed by in-depth interviews. The study revealed that the environmental dimension of sustainability is most important to consumers’ definition of a “sustainable food system”. Likewise, the sustainability of chicken meat products was most commonly associated with the perceived environmental impact of chicken meat production, followed by animal welfare aspects. Consumers made incorrect inferences about some sustainability labels and these inferences sometimes contributed to positive associations with sustainability. Consumers frequently associated a higher price with higher sustainability, indicating a belief that “doing the right thing” might cost more. This study provides new insights regarding consumers’ perceptions of production-related credence attributes and sustainability labels.

Highlights

  • Food systems, from production to consumption, have an important role to play in achieving the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [1]

  • As a point of comparison, we provide the metrics for the Grown in Australia label, price, cut, and meat appearance

  • Future research could test the impact of different information/messaging on personal motivation to purchase more sustainable meat products. Results of this exploratory multi-method study suggest that the environmental pillar of sustainability is most important to Australian consumers’ definition of a “sustainable food system”, followed by the economic, social, and cultural pillars

Read more

Summary

Introduction

From production to consumption, have an important role to play in achieving the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [1]. Progress towards several of the SDGs depends on the development of more sustainable food systems [2]. It is not surprising that food system issues have been explored in-depth in the sustainability literature, especially regarding the impact of food production and consumption on the environment [1,3]. Other sustainability issues relating to social and economic aspects of food production and consumption include food security [1,6] food waste [7], and animal welfare [8].

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call