Abstract

Sustainable development must satisfy the needs of present generations without compromising the ability of future generations to meet theirs. Although it looks at the economic, environmental and social aspects of sustainability, this article focuses specifically on an analysis of the concept in conjunction with the use and protection of natural resources. It shows how taking account of environmental goods, including the finite nature of certain natural resources, can change the way economists deal with the issues of growth, development and equity between generations. In this context, after a brief historical perspective on the concept of development, the paper shows how the potential for substitutability between natural and manufactured capital, for example in production technologies, lead to two paradigms, that of weak sustainability and that of strong sustainability. These two approaches are presented in an effort to explain how their merits can be mutually reinforcing.

Highlights

  • The purpose of this article is to show how economic research can approach and analyze the issue of sustainability, its significance and its challenges

  • In the context of strong sustainability (Section 3.3), we shall emphasize the problems posed by defining critical types of natural capital and sustainable development indicators

  • This concept of economic development determined the prime objective assigned to development policies, which was to raise standards of living by supplying growing populations with the goods and services that would allow them to attain the final level of development

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The purpose of this article is to show how economic research can approach and analyze the issue of sustainability, its significance and its challenges. In the context of weak sustainability (Section 3.1), we shall emphasize the considerable difficulty in taking account of intergenerational equity (to avoid favoring one generation, whichever that may be). In the context of strong sustainability (Section 3.3), we shall emphasize the problems posed by defining critical types of natural capital and sustainable development indicators

Development
Sustainable Development
Weak and Strong Sustainability
Weak Sustainability
The discounted utility criterion or the dictatorship of the present
The Green Golden Rule or the dictatorship of the future
The problem of taking account of intergenerational equity
Chichilinisky’s criterion
The mixed Bentham-Rawls criterion and Rawls’ principle of just saving
The search for invariants
The viability theory
Strong Sustainability
Critical natural capitals
Indicators of sustainable development
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call