Abstract
There are growing claims that meaningfully engaging with complex sustainability challenges requires change of a systemic nature. In governing transitions to sustainability, laboratories in real world contexts are growing in presence and promise. Yet, they span an array of contexts, conceptualisations and cases, making it difficult to find and relate labs across disciplines. Moreover, it is unclear how these labs vary in their approaches to sustainability, the importance of which has been voiced by the sustainability transitions community. In addressing these concerns, we adopted the broad research question: How can sustainability-oriented labs in real-world contexts be understood? We systematically reviewed 53 labs from disparate fields of research that broadly share a focus on sustainability. Through a mixed-methods analysis, we present three levels of results. Firstly, we provide an overview of the diversity in distribution, thematic focus and setup of labs. Secondly, we trace 7 different research communities where sustainability-oriented labs have been conceptualized (Living, Urban Living, Real-world, Evolutionary Learning, Urban Transition, Change and Transformation labs). Thirdly, we identify three key dimensions of labs, space, process and organisation, enabling a structured understanding of lab approaches towards sustainability. We then situate our results within salient transitions research areas, namely transition geographies, governance and innovation. In concluding, we point towards fruitful avenues for future research, capable of 1) unpacking lab approaches to sustainability as a dynamic normative property, and 2) providing a basis for complementary case-based comparison.
Highlights
There is growing recognition that complex sustainability challenges e ranging from segregation and inequality to biodiversity and climate change e cannot be approached adequately without fundamental changes in socio-ecological and socio-technical systems (Díaz et al, 2020; United Nations, 2015; Ko€hler et al, 2019)
There is insufficient oversight into the nature of labs that have an explicit orientation towards sustainability
In 3.1 we provide a descriptive overview of sustainability-oriented labs at a sample level
Summary
There is growing recognition that complex sustainability challenges e ranging from segregation and inequality to biodiversity and climate change e cannot be approached adequately without fundamental changes in socio-ecological and socio-technical systems (Díaz et al, 2020; United Nations, 2015; Ko€hler et al, 2019). In the sustainability transitions community, there are calls for deconfiguration and reconfiguration of coupled, open-ended systems (Loorbach et al, 2017).. In the sustainability transitions community, there are calls for deconfiguration and reconfiguration of coupled, open-ended systems (Loorbach et al, 2017).1 Transitions of this kind are claimed to involve radical qualitative changes in the personal sphere concerning beliefs, values, worldviews and paradigms Agenda 2030 does call for a fundamental transformation of “our world to the better” as paramount in fulfilling all SDGs (United Nations, 2015). In discussions around transitions and transformation, attention is extending beyond understanding historical transitions, towards processes that enable the collective exploration of desirable and sustainable futures and a deliberate facilitation in this direction (Loorbach et al, 2017; Hilden et al, 2017)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.