Abstract

An increasing number of countries develop bio-economy strategies to promote a stronger reliance on the efficient use of renewable biological resources in order to meet multiple sustainability challenges. At the global scale, however, bio-economies are diverse, with sectors such as agriculture, forestry, energy, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, as well as science and education. In this study, we developed a typology of bio-economies based on country-specific characteristics, and describe five different bio-economy types with varying degrees of importance in the primary and the high-tech sector. We also matched the bio-economy types against the foci of their bio-economy strategies and evaluated their sustainability performance. Overall, high-tech bio-economies seem to be more diversified in terms of their policy strategies while the policies of those relying on the primary sector are focused on bioenergy and high-tech industries. In terms of sustainability performance, indicators suggest that diversified high-tech economies have experienced a slight sustainability improvement, especially in terms of resource consumption. Footprints remain, however, at the highest levels compared to all other bio-economy types with large amounts of resources and raw materials being imported from other countries. These results highlight the necessity of developed high-tech bio-economies to further decrease their environmental footprint domestically and internationally, and the importance of biotechnology innovation transfer after critical and comprehensive sustainability assessments.

Highlights

  • Despite the current drop in price, many fossil fuel resources are becoming increasingly scarce [1], and their consumption is associated with climate change, and harmful effects on ecosystems and human health

  • This paper aims at improving our understanding of the determinants and sustainability implications of the supply and demand of bio-based products, and our knowledge about the global bio-economy by answering the following research questions: (1) How do countries differ in terms of their bio-economy and comparative advantages? (2) Can these differences be explained by the adoption of different national policies? And (3) what are the sustainability implications of these different bio-economy pathways? First, we characterize bio-economy types based on a set of indicators that we expect to be associated with countries’ strategic decisions to embark on a particular bio-based development pathway

  • Our results revealed four different bio-economy types which we named according to their characteristics, Diversified bio-economies (Diverse), Advanced primary sector bio-economies (AdvancedPrim), High-tech bio-economies (HighTech), and Basic primary sector bio-economies (BasicPrim)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite the current drop in price, many fossil fuel resources are becoming increasingly scarce [1], and their consumption is associated with climate change, and harmful effects on ecosystems and human health. Population growth and corresponding pressures on natural resources have risen beyond safe ecological limits [2]. In response to these societal challenges, countries have adopted ambitious global goals such as the 2 ◦C limit to global warming, the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). While early publications adopted sector specific definitions or focused purely on biotechnology [8,9], the bio-economy is increasingly being understood to include all kinds of economic activity that rely on biological processes, products, and principles [10]. In this study we adopt a broad definition that includes traditionally bio-based sectors such as agriculture and forestry, and bio-based pharmaceutics, waste treatment, energy, bio-plastics, and chemicals

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.