Abstract

Noises and vibrations caused by operating transport systems can seriously affect people’s health and environmental ecosystems. Railway-induced vibrations in urban settings can cause disturbances and damages to surrounding buildings, infrastructures and residents. Over many decades, a number of mitigation methods have been proposed to attenuate vibrations at the source, in the transmission path, or at the receiver. In fact, low-frequency or ground-borne vibration is turned out to be more difficult to be mitigated at source, whilst some attenuation measures in propagation path can be applicable. To broaden the mitigating range at the low-frequency band, the applications of meta-materials/structures have been established. In railway systems, periodic structures or resonators can be installed near the protected buildings to isolate the vibrations. Despite a large number of proposed attenuation methods, the sustainability of those methods has not been determined. Based on rational engineering assumptions, the discounted cash flows in construction and maintenance processes are analysed in this study to evaluate lifecycle costs and the quantity of materials and fuels, as well as the amount of carbon emissions. This study is the world’s first to identify the efficacy and sustainability of some transmission path attenuation methods in both normal and adverse weather conditions. It reveals that geofoam trenches and wave impeding blocks are the most suitable methods. Although metamaterial applications can significantly mitigate a wider range of lower frequency vibrations, the total cost and carbon emissions are relatively high. It is necessary to significantly modify design parameters in order to enable low-cost and low-carbon meta-materials/structures in reality.

Highlights

  • Railway systems have been regarded as one of the most sustainable and safest public transport modes

  • Considering that conventional at-source attenuation methods can only mitigate the vibration in a limited range of frequency, some methods that can control low-frequency vibration in railway systems will be discussed

  • Given that the mitigation mechanism of metamaterial resonators is not based on structural periodicity, the structural size of resonators would not be as large as the pile diameter in pile barriers discussed above in order to achieve low-frequency vibration abatements

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Railway systems have been regarded as one of the most sustainable and safest public transport modes. To compare the effectiveness and sustainability of the mitigation methods in terms of lifecycle cost and carbon emissions, the sources of railway vibration and the types of attenuation methods need to be identified first. Based on the lifecycle assessment results, the effectiveness of these methods can be compared in terms of economy and environmental protection in both normal and adverse weather conditions. This investigation is the world’s first to determine the sustainability of the vibration abatement methods when exposed to extreme weather conditions. The insight into lifecycle cost and carbon footprint will underpin the sustainable strategies and cleaner solutions for railway noise and vibration mitigation practices when exposed to extreme events due to climate change uncertainties and natural hazards

Methods for Vibration Mitigations in Railway Corridors
Clamped Metamaterial Stopbands
Metamaterial Resonators
Geofoam Filled Trenches
Sheet Pile Wall
Subgrade Stiffening
Jet Grouting Columns
Vibro-Replacement with Stone Columns
Wave Impeding Blocks
Impacts of Extreme Temperature
Methodology
Engineering Assumptions
Lifecycle Cost Analysis
Carbon Emissions Analysis
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call