Abstract

To be sustainable, farmed fish should be environmentally suitable, biologically ideal, socially acceptable and economically viable. As these sustainability indicators (SIs) strongly influence consumers’ fish purchase intent, farms should report them as a balanced source of sustainability information. However, in the literature, little attention has been paid to biological indicators in assessing aquaculture sustainability, nor to the extent of the SIs. Furthermore, the assessed SIs have not been examined by consumers. Therefore, this study measures consumers’ perceived value of these. Consumers’ sustainability knowledge and attitude towards farm-raised fish are also taken into account. Multinomial logit and basic latent class logit models are employed, together with a direct survey of households in Bangladesh. The results demonstrate that a low level of water use and appropriate feeding in the production process (e.g., environmental and biological indicators) of farmed fish increase consumers’ utility and that they are willing to pay a price premium for these attributes. Consumers look for the ‘safety label’, which indicates intermediately, averagely, and fairly sustainable farmed fish. Initially, consumers prefer averagely sustainable fish, but when they eat a high amount of farmed fish in their total fish consumption, they are more likely to prefer fairly sustainable ones, which are high sustainable. Therefore, the study results indicate that produced fish should be marketed with environmental and biological sustainability indicators, including food safety labels. Additionally, a close monitoring system will increase social acceptability, leading to sustainable fish farming and consumption.

Highlights

  • Because of its nutritional value and dietary features, fish consumption has been increasing globally

  • Since little is known on this subject, this study aims to fill the knowledge gap and help design a sustainable aquaculture policy by investigating the effect of consumers’ perceived values of the sustainability indicators (SIs) of fish attributes, their sustainability knowledge, their attitude towards aquaculture products when choosing farmed fish, and their willingness to pay (WTP)

  • The results reveal that almost all the respondents (93 %) had bought fish during the previous month

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Because of its nutritional value and dietary features, fish consumption has been increasing globally. With population growth, overfishing, pollution, and ocean acidification, wild fish stocks have significantly decreased (Gordon et al, 2018). This rising fish demand and the decline in wild fish have influenced the growth of aquaculture over the last four decades (World Bank, 2013; Naylor et al, 2000). Consumers need to consider whether the fish is wild or farmed when they are shopping. Consumers remain unsure whether the fish have been preserved with harmful additives or preservatives. Their dependency on fish product information has

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call