Abstract
This paper reviews European land and bioenergy potential studies to 1) identify shortcomings related to how they account for agricultural intensification and its associated environmental effects, and sustainability constraints, and 2) provide suggestions on how these shortcomings can be improved in future assessments. The key shortcomings are:The environmental impacts of intensification are nearly always ignored in the reviewed studies, while these impacts should be accounted for if intensification is required to make land available for energy cropping.Future productivity developments of crops and livestock, and the associated land-use and environmental effects are currently limited to conventional intensification measures whereby the proportion between inputs and outputs is fixed. Sustainable intensification measures, which increase land productivity with similar or lower inputs, are ignored in the reviewed studies.Livestock productivity developments, livestock specific intensification measures and their environmental effects are poorly or not at all covered in the reviewed studies.Most studies neglect sustainability constraints other than GHG emissions in the selection of energy crops. This includes limitations to rainfed energy crop cultivation, a minimum number of crop species, the structural diversity within cropping areas and the integration of energy crops in existing or new crop rotations, while simultaneously considering the effects on subsequent crops.These shortcomings suggest that the identification of sustainable pathways for European bioenergy production requires a more integrative approach combining land demand for food, feed and energy crop production, including different intensification pathways, and the consequent direct and indirect environmental impacts. A better inclusion of management practices into such approach will improve the assessment of intensification, its environmental consequences and the sustainable bioenergy potential from agricultural feedstocks.
Highlights
Land is a finite and increasingly scarce resource
Given the limitations described above, this paper aims at 1) identifying shortcomings in land and bioenergy potential estimates related to how they account for agricultural intensification, its associated environmental effects and other sustainability constraints, and 2) providing suggestions on how these shortcomings crucial for sustainable biomass production may be improved in future assessments
The total land and biomass potential should be considered as the total land and biomass available for both energy and material purposes
Summary
Land is a finite and increasingly scarce resource. Competition for land will increase to meet future food and fibre demand of a growing population [1,2]. Producing additional agricultural output for bioenergy feedstock can be achieved by extending cropland and pastures into new areas, thereby replacing natural ecosystems (i.e. expansion), and/or by improving productivity of existing cultivated land through the increased or more efficient use of inputs, improvement of agronomic practices and crop varieties and other innovations (i.e. intensification) [3,4]. Both options have positive and negative environmental effects. Sustainable intensification measures include precision agriculture, multiple cropping systems using crop rotations, intercropping or agroforestry systems, zero or reduced tillage systems and the
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
