Abstract
The environmental impacts and water savings of different configurations of non-potable domestic water use (toilet flushing and laundry), sourced from rainwater harvesting (RWH) and air-conditioning condensate water (ACWH), in multi-family buildings in Israel are examined. Two building types differing in specific roof areas, and three climatic sub-regions were modeled. RWH satisfied 23 and 46% of the water demand for toilet flushing and laundry in high-rise and low-rise buildings, respectively. Air conditioning is used almost daily during Israel’s hot and dry summers. Hence, the combined RWH-ACWH system saved 42 and 64% in high- and low-rise buildings, respectively. Displacing desalinated seawater, a significant water source in Israel, with alternative water sources lowered the environmental impacts with an increase in storage, up to a certain volume, beyond which impacts started rising. The same infrastructure is used during winter for RWH and for ACWH during summer; thus, combining the two exhibits significant water savings, with marginal extra costs while lowering the environmental impacts.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
