Abstract
Recently, Level(s) has been developed by the European Commission as a common EU framework to assess sustainability of buildings with the intention to provide a consistent and comparable framework across national boundaries. It aims at providing a general language for sustainability for buildings and to promote life cycle thinking. This paper describes the application and results of a Level 1 assessment for the design stage of a Flemish office building. Level 1 is a common performance assessment which aims to be used amongst others by building professionals. Common standards and simplified methods are used for the indicators. The paper focusses on the experiences of testing the method by evaluating the user-friendliness of the assessment method for architects considering the information and calculations needed. The added value of applying the methodology in the design stage is furthermore discussed. Based on the test phase, further improvement is recommended by aligning current national tools for data gathering and by providing default values. A Level 1 assessment allows to gain insights in various performances of a building but does not aim to evaluate the “sustainability” level. A level 2 assessment is probably more useful for practitioners to make well-founded choices between different design options.
Highlights
The building industry, being one of the biggest waste creators and energy consumers, started to pay significantly more attention to sustainable buildings during the past decades
This paper describes the application and results of a Level 1 assessment for the design stage of a Flemish office building
Based on the test phase, further improvement is recommended by aligning current national tools for data gathering and by providing default values
Summary
The building industry, being one of the biggest waste creators and energy consumers, started to pay significantly more attention to sustainable buildings during the past decades. Since the first mentioning of sustainable development in 1987 in ‘Our Common Future’, the assessment of sustainable development in the building sector has gone through an evolution [1]. Different stakeholders have to make informed decisions in order to meet sustainability goals [2]. John Elkington defined the three fundaments of the Brundtland report as ‘triple P’ (People, Planet and Profit) in 1994 [3], but without defining the importance of each the three pillars. Based on personal interests and views on society, different attitudes towards sustainable development have appeared, reflected in a proliferation of sustainability assessment methods for buildings [4]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.