Abstract

Background Microdeletion syndromes are characterized by small (< 5Mb) chromosomal deletion in which one or more genes are involved. They are frequently associated with multiple congenital anomalies. The phenotype is the result of haploin sufficiency of genes in the critical interval. Fluorescent In-Situ Hybridization (FISH), Multiplex Ligationdependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), Quantitative Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction (QFPCR) and Array (microarray) Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) techniques are commonly used for precise genetic diagnosis of microdeletion syndromes.

Highlights

  • Microdeletion syndromes are characterized by small (< 5Mb) chromosomal deletion in which one or more genes are involved

  • Fluorescent In-Situ Hybridization (FISH), Multiplex Ligationdependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), Quantitative Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction (QFPCR) and Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization techniques are commonly used for precise genetic diagnosis of microdeletion syndromes

  • Microarray was picked up copy number variation (CNV) with or without copy neutral loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in approximately 70% of cases, mostly involving several chromosome loci

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Microdeletion syndromes are characterized by small (< 5Mb) chromosomal deletion in which one or more genes are involved. They are frequently associated with multiple congenital anomalies. The phenotype is the result of haploin sufficiency of genes in the critical interval. Fluorescent In-Situ Hybridization (FISH), Multiplex Ligationdependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), Quantitative Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction (QFPCR) and Array (microarray) Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) techniques are commonly used for precise genetic diagnosis of microdeletion syndromes

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call