Abstract

The present study was conducted in five Gossypium mustelinum populations that were phenotyped and genotyped to quantify their resistance to the major diseases that affect cultivated cotton (G. hirsutum) in Brazil. Four G. mustelinum populations, in addition to genotypes of G. hirsutum and G. barbadense (resistant or susceptible controls), were phenotyped for resistance to cotton blue disease, angular leaf spot, common mosaic and ramulose. Artificial inoculation of cotton plants with causative agents of cotton blue disease, angular leaf spot and ramulose, as well as those naturally infested with common mosaic virus, showed that all G. mustelinum accessions were susceptible to every disease studied. Four microsatellite markers linked to disease resistance genes for cotton blue disease, angular leaf spot and root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in G. hirsutum were used for genotyping of the five populations. The markers amplified different alleles from those associated with resistance genes in cultivated cotton, revealing polymorphisms different from reported cases of G. hirsutum resistance. The susceptibility to all diseases studied may represent a phytosanitary risk for the in situ conservation of natural G. mustelinum populations.

Highlights

  • In situ conservation of landraces or wild relatives of cultivated plants can be hindered if crops are cultivated near these populations

  • Artificial inoculation of cotton plants with causative agents of cotton blue disease, angular leaf spot and ramulose, as well as those naturally infested with common mosaic virus, showed that all G. mustelinum accessions were susceptible to every disease studied

  • Four microsatellite markers linked to disease resistance genes for cotton blue disease, angular leaf spot and root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in G. hirsutum were used for genotyping of the five populations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In situ conservation of landraces or wild relatives of cultivated plants can be hindered if crops are cultivated near these populations. One possible interference is the genetic mischaracterization of wild populations due to gene flow (Groot et al, 2003). This possibility has been discussed with greater emphasis after the commercial release of genetically modified cultivars (Ellstrand et al, 1999; Darmency, 2008). The causative agent of the disease has a wide range of hosts, including related species. In such cases, co-cultivation of susceptible species may have a negative impact on natural populations

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.