Abstract

Objectie To investigate the susceptibility of drug-resistant staphylococci isolated from different parts of the anterior segment to levofloxacin, tobramycin, cefazolin sodium, fusidic acid and clindamycin. Methods: Experimental Study. A total of 67 patients with anterior segment infection (33 cases of conjunctivitis, 6 cases of bacterial keratitis, 7 cases of blepharitis, 9 cases of neonatal dacryocystitis, 9 cases of neonatal dacryocystitis, 1 case of adult dacryocystitis and 11 cases of other infectious eye diseases) were collected from the conjunctival sac, cornea, eyelid margin and lacrimal sac. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus (MRS) strains and β-lactamase-producing (β-Lac) strains by a micro-liquid-based method, according to the M100 standard of the American Institute for Clinical and Laboratory Standardization Susceptibility and resistance determinations were made. Data were statistically analyzed using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Results: Thirty-five MRS, 30 β-Lac and 2 β-Lac MRS isolates were identified from 67 multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus . There were 3, 9, 4, and 19 MRS isolates isolated from the lacrimal sac, cornea, eyelid margin and conjunctival sac, accounting for 3/4, 9/12, 4/8, 19/43 (44.2%) of the isolated sites respectively. There were 1, 3, 3, and 23 β-Lac isolates, accounting for 1/4, 3/12, 3/8 and 23/43 (53.5%) of the isolated sites, respectively. The highest proportion of β-Lac isolates isolated from patients with a diagnosis of conjunctivitis was 17 (25.3%) from the conjunctival sac. Among the MRS strains isolated from the cornea and lacrimal sac, 5 (7.5%) and 3 (4.5%) were from patients diagnosed with bacterial keratitis and neonatal tear, respectively. The number of MRS strains and β-Lac isolates isolated from patients with a diagnosis of blepharitis were both 3 (4.5%) from the lid margin.Among the strains isolated from the eyelid margin and the conjunctival sac, drug-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis was the main strain, the drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was the major isolates in lacrimal sac and cornea. Among the 35 MRS isoaltes, 25, 24, 12, 12, and 11 were sensitive to cefazolin sodium, fusidic acid, levofloxacin, clindamycin and tobramycin, and the sensitivity rates were 71.4%, 68.6%, 34.3%, 34.3% and 31.4%, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=22.756, P<0.001), The sensitivity rates of levofloxacin, tobramycin, cefazolin sodium, fusidic acid and clindamycin against MRS isolates from the anterior segment were both statistically significant differences (χ2=18.493, 11.594, 8.906, 9.841, 16.059; all P<0.05). The susceptibility rates of MRS isolates against five antibiotics was statistically significant differences (χ2=33.080, P<0.001). Among the 30 β-Lac isolates, 27, 22, 19, 16, and 8 were sensitive to cefazolin sodium, fusidic acid, levofloxacin, tobramycin and clindamycin, and the sensitivity rates were 90.0 % , 73.3%, 63.3%, 53.3% and 26.7%, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=28.280, P<0.001). The sensitivity rates of five antibiotics against β-Lac isolates from the anterior segment were both statistically significant differences (χ2=50.971, 24.543, 48.147, 44.899, 18.676; all P<0.001). The susceptibility rates of β-Lac isolates against five antibiotics was statistically significant differences (χ2=23.383, P<0.001). The sensitivity of cefazolin sodium and fusidic acid against β-Lac isolates were higher than MRS isolates. Conclusions: Cefazolin sodium and fusidic acid may be the best choice for the treatment of drug-resistant Staphylococcus isolated from anterior conjunctival sac, cornea, eyelid margin and lacrimal sac, especially for β-Lac-producing drug-resistant Staphylococcus infection.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.