Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the artifacts induced by crowns composed of different materials with prepared teeth and titanium implants. Resin, metal-ceramic, ceramic and zirconia crowns were fabricated and placed onto the prepared teeth on a human cadaver head or titanium implants with prosthesis abutments on a dry human mandible. The samples were scanned on a 1.5 T MRI apparatus, and artifact areas were defined as the signal intensity and signal loss adjacent to the prosthesis and measured by a threshold tool with ImageJ2x. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0. Resin, ceramic, zirconia, and precious metal-ceramic crowns barely produced artifacts on the cadaver skull (p > 0.999). By contrast, pure Ti and nonprecious metal-ceramic crowns created significant artifacts (p < 0.001). The average artifacts reduction of double Au-Pt and Ag-Pd metal-ceramic crowns combined with titanium implants and abutments was 79.49 mm2 (p < 0.001) and 74.17 mm2 (p < 0.001) respectively, while artifact areas were increased in double Co-Cr and Ni–Cr metal-ceramic crowns by 150.10 mm2 (p < 0.001) and 175.50 mm2 (p < 0.001) respectively. Zirconia, ceramic and precious metal-ceramic crowns induce less MRI artifacts after tooth preparation while precious metal-ceramic crowns alleviate artifacts in combination with titanium implants.

Highlights

  • This study aimed to investigate the artifacts induced by crowns composed of different materials with prepared teeth and titanium implants

  • The results revealed that the resin crown barely produced artifacts, and its signal was similar to that of the surrounding soft tissue (Fig. 3a)

  • Moderate arc-shaped artifacts could be observed around pure Ti metal-ceramic crowns

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This study aimed to investigate the artifacts induced by crowns composed of different materials with prepared teeth and titanium implants. Metal-ceramic, ceramic and zirconia crowns were fabricated and placed onto the prepared teeth on a human cadaver head or titanium implants with prosthesis abutments on a dry human mandible. Susceptibility artifacts, referred to as metal artifacts, are caused by differences in susceptibility between a prosthesis and the adjacent tissue, thereby inducing inhomogeneity in a magnetic ­field[6]. Metallic prostheses, such as different kinds of full crowns and titanium implant restorations may distort images during MRI examinations and interfere with clinical ­diagnosis[7,8,9]. Titanium implants are stable and well-known prostheses for missing teeth and have gained clinical preference because of their desirable biomechanics, biocompatibility and non-invasive p­ roperties[13,14]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call