Survivor pain: Experience at an oncology palliative care clinic.

Abstract

260 Background: As of January 2014 there are an estimated 14.5 million cancer survivors in the United States. In observational studies of cancer survivors up to 40% report chronic pain. Opioids remain an important and effective treatment for active cancer pain. For survivors, however, we must take into account the paucity of data supporting long term benefits of opioids on pain and functional outcomes, and extensive evidence of potential harms. We present data from our palliative care clinic where we have established a nuanced approach to pain management in this population, which includes risk mitigation, consistent education, emphasis on non-pharmacological and non-opiate medications, and attempts to down-taper opioid analgesics when feasible. Methods: Retrospective, observational chart review of 62 patients identified as cancer survivors, who have been managed for pain, at an academically affiliated palliative care clinic embedded in the oncology department. Demographic information, baseline and latest visit pain scores and functional assessments, as well as pain regimen data were collected. Means for pain and functionality scores were compared for those patient’s with differing opioid regimens and nonpharmacological treatments. Results: Of the 62 patients reviewed, 48 were tapered off opioid medication. In the patients who were tapered off opioid medications, 8 (16%) showed an increase in average pain scores, 11 (22%) showed no change in average pain scores, and 29 (60%) showed improvement in average pain score. Conclusions: In 82% of the patients whose opioid medications were decreased, average pain scores either remained the same or actually improved over time. This is encouraging data to support the theory that decreasing opioids in cancer survivors does not worsen pain control in the majority of that population.