Abstract

PurposeTo audit outcomes after introducing frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases, including co-interventions: neurosurgery, systemic therapy, and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). We report median overall survival (MS), local failure, and distant brain failure. We hypothesized patients treated with SRS would have clinically meaningful improved MS compared with historic institutional values. We further hypothesized that patients treated with co-interventions would have clinically meaningful improved MS compared with patients treated with SRS alone.MethodsOne hundred twenty patients (N = 120) with limited intracranial disease underwent 130 frameless SRS sessions from April 2010 to May 2013. Median follow-up was 11 months. MS was measured from brain metastases diagnosis, local failure, and distant brain failure from the time of first SRS.ResultsPractice pattern during the first year of the study favored upfront WBRT (79%) over SRS (21%) while upfront SRS (45%) was almost as common as upfront WBRT (55%) in the last year of the study. MS was 18 months; 37% received SRS alone as initial radiotherapy (MS 12 months); 63% received WBRT prior to SRS (MS 19 months); 50% received systemic therapy post-SRS (MS 21 months); and 26% had tumor resection then SRS to the surgical cavity (MS 42 months). Local failure occurred in 10% of lesions and radio-necrosis occurred in 4%. Differences in distant brain failure among patients treated with upfront SRS (40% rate), WBRT followed by SRS (33% rate) or systemic therapy post-SRS (37% rate) were not statistically significant.ConclusionFrameless SRS effectively treats surgical cavities, persistent tumors post-WBRT, and can be used as an upfront treatment of brain metastases. Surgery, systemic therapy, and WBRT are associated with longer MS. Patients can live for years while receiving multiple therapies. Systemic therapy for patients with brain metastases is increasingly common, palliative care occurs earlier and improves survival, and WBRT use is not routine. Modern series sometimes produce unexpectedly good results. Classification and treatment protocols are evolving. This practice audit is note-worthy for (i) high median overall survival, (ii) systemic therapy after radiosurgery for patients with tumors treated by radiosurgery, (iii) distant brain failure not significantly related to WBRT, and (iv) neurosurgery, systemic therapy, and WBRT are independently associated with improved MS.

Highlights

  • Brain metastases cause significant morbidity and mortality [1]

  • Differences in distant brain failure among patients treated with upfront Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) (40% rate), whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) followed by SRS (33% rate) or systemic therapy post-SRS (37% rate) were not statistically significant

  • We report a contemporary sequential cohort of 120 patients treated with frameless SRS; some patients received neurosurgery, systemic therapy, and WBRT

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Brain metastases cause significant morbidity and mortality [1]. Patients often are not eligible for clinical trials. Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and/or supportive care [2] are standard for patients with multiple brain metastases. Surgical and radiotherapy interventions can control limited intracranial disease [1,2,3,4]. Surgical resection is considered for patients with solitary lesions and good performance status, or for bleeding, edema or tissue diagnosis [3]. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can achieve local control with or without surgery or WBRT [5,6,7]. SRS/WBRT/supportive care are options at intracranial progression

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call