Abstract

ObjectiveTo analyse the outcomes of metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer patients treated with palliative intent chemotherapy, as data on their outcomes are scant from LMIC.MethodsIn this retrospective analysis, 302 upfront metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer patients were treated with palliative intent from 1 January 2015 till 31 March 2020. The demographics, palliative therapy details, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall—survival (OS) were analysed for those receiving chemotherapy.ResultsThe median age was 53 (IQR 48-61) years and 248, (82.0 %) patients belonged to low-socioeconomic strata. Most common histology was squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in 263 (87.1%) patients. De novo metastatic disease was seen in 119 (39.4 %) and recurrence post-treatment was seen in 183 (60.6 %) patients. Among the 302 patients, 149 (49.3%) patients received palliative chemotherapy, 70 (23.2 %) received palliative radiotherapy and 83 (27.5%) patients were considered for palliative care alone. The most common regimen was paclitaxel and carboplatin in 124 (83.2 %) patients. Eighty (53.7 %) patients completed 6 cycles. Four (2.7 %) received bevacizumab with chemotherapy in the first line and 3 (2.0%) patients received pembrolizumab in second line. The median PFS was 8.5 months (95% CI: 7.12–9.89 months) and median OS was 13.0 months (95% CI: 11.10–14.98 months) with median duration of follow-up of 33.4 months (range 27.9–38.9 months).ConclusionsIn real-world scenario, only half of the metastatic or recurrent cervical patients received any palliative chemotherapy. Paclitaxel and carboplatin are an effective regimen, and there was limited access to targeted therapy and immunotherapy.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.