Survival of cadaveric renal allografts in Hispanic as compared with Caucasian recipients.

Abstract

Evaluation of allograft survival rates revealed a significantly better overall graft survival in Hispanic (n = 66) as compared with Caucasian (n = 38) recipients of primary cadaveric renal transplants. There were no significant differences between the Hispanic and Caucasian cadaveric recipient groups in terms of patient survival, pretransplant transfusion status, immunosuppressive protocols, rejection therapy, mean age, or frequency of diabetes mellitus. Cadaveric donor ethnic origin (i.e., Caucasian or Hispanic) did not significantly alter graft survival rates in either recipient ethnic group. Although Caucasian patients with splenectomies had better cadaveric graft survival than Caucasian graft recipients without splenectomies (P = .02), splenectomy had no significant effect on the renal allograft survival rate in Hispanics. Other factors that were evaluated and found not to correlate significantly with cadaveric graft survival rates were donor recipient HLA matching (A, B, or DR), and panel reactivities of recipient pregraft serum samples. In contrast to the superior cadaveric renal allograft survival in Hispanic as compared with Caucasian recipients, 1-haplotype-matched or 2-haplotype-matched living-related renal allografts had comparable graft survival rates in Caucasian and Hispanic recipients. These results indicate that Hispanics without splenectomy enjoy a cadaveric renal allograft survival rate superior to nonsegregated populations (treated with conventional immunosuppression) reported elsewhere.