Abstract
To evaluate the survival of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSC) and periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSC) in BMMSC/PDLSC cell sheets which transplanted ectopically into subcutaneous dorsum of nude mice. The canine BMMSC and PDLSC from primary culture were tranfected with lentiviral vectors carrying green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene (Lentivirus-GFP) or red fluorescent protein (RFP) gene (Lentivirus-RFP) respectively. The immunophenotypes of GFP-labeled BMMSC and RFP-labeled PDLSC were identified by flow cytometry. Adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of them were detected by alizarin red or oil red O respectively. Then, both GFP-labeled BMMSC cell sheets and RFP-labeled PDLSC cell sheets were fabricated respectively using normal culture dish (6 cm) after stimulation of extracellular matrix formation. Each was enveloped by collagen membrane (Bio-Gide) and then transplanted into the subcutaneous dorsum of nude mice. In vivo non-invasive biofluorescence imaging(BFI) was performed at 1, 2, 4 and 8 w post-tranplantation to trace and quantify the survival and growth of RFP-labeled PDLSC and GFP-labeled BMMSC via the BFI system of the NightOWL. The fluorescence intensity change of GFP/RFP signal was monitored and compared. The mice were sacrificed 8 weeks after cell sheets transplantation and the survival of stem cells was verified by fluorescence immunohistochemistry. The flow cytometry showed that GFP-labeled BMMSC positively expressed CD29, CD44, CD34, STRO-1 were 93.07%, 92.84%, 3.23%, 67.67%, and RFP-labeled PDLSCs were 89.91%, 88.47%, 6.04%, 74.11%, respectively. Both of them had the potency of differentiating into osteoblasts and adipocytes. The stemness of both of them was almost same. After being transplanted into nude mice, the signal strength of GFP(BMMSC) was weaker and weaker in 1, 2, 4 and 8 w [(83.1±3.1)×10(6), (65.1±2.3)×10(6), (51.5 ± 2.3)×10(6), (33.8 ± 2.0)×10(6) ph/s, respectively.]. The signal strength of RFP(PDLSC) was weakenedin 1, 2 and 4 w [(53.8±3.0)×10(6), (42.2±2.6)×10(6), (34.5±2.1)×10(6) ph/s], then recovered in 8 w ([ 45.1±2.9)×10(6) ph/s]. The signal strength of RFP(PDLSC) was signifcantly stronger in 8 w than in 4 w(P < 0.01). The survival of RFP-labeled PDLSC was significant higher than that of GFP-labeled BMMSC. After 8 weeks, lots of RFP-labeled PDLSC were observed by microscope, but less GFP-labeled BMMSC were observed. Histometric analysis revealed that the survival of stem cells in the RFP-labeled PDLSC cell sheets was significantly higher than that of in the GFP-labeled BMMSCs cell sheets.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.